Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unmentioned Energy Fix: A 55 M.P.H. Speed Limit -NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:16 PM
Original message
Unmentioned Energy Fix: A 55 M.P.H. Speed Limit -NYT
President Bush made it clear last week that he sees no quick fixes to the nation's energy woes. The problem has been long in coming, the argument goes, and so will the solutions. But if history is any guide, there is one thing he could do immediately: bring back the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit.

It has been done before. Along with record oil and gasoline prices, improvements in fuel efficiency and a lasting economic recession, speed limits helped curb fuel consumption for the first time in American postwar history between 1974 and 1984.

Of course, energy eventually became cheap again, the economy expanded and Americans became complacent and unwilling to make more sacrifices.

Instead of opting for small fuel-efficient cars, people switched to large sport utility vehicles and larger pickups. As drivers groaned and states fought for their right to speed, the limit was raised.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/01/business/01oil.html?ex=1272600000&en=4cef66ea0e5c53d5&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Better yet: 55 for SUVs, 65 for small efficient cars.
We'd probably reduce the amount of carnage on the highways too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Now THAT'S a good idea.
Double the incentives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. This would be the spark for a revolution
People would go nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthSideCubsFan Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder where you live?
Bet it's not in a rural or semi-rural area.

My car gets 32+ mpg at 70+ mph. I see no reason why I should take an hour to an hour and a half away from my family each week to save two-thirds of a gallon of gas.

My time is worth something too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. I Bet You'd Get Worse Mileage At 55
Today's cars are designed to run leaner at higher speeds--unlike the dinosaurs of the 60's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. I know one guy who wouldn't follow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Good ghod.
He looks like such a buffoon.

Then, I remember that he is a buffoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. HELL NO!
A 200 mile trip, That is another hour on the road burning gas. Now at 70 that trip is 2 hours and 40 minutes. At 55 mph it is 3 and a half hours.

At 70 I can make a round trip in one day, no problem. At 55 the trip is too long and I have a tendency to fall a sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another Way To Save Gas
Edited on Sat Apr-30-05 08:43 PM by AndyTiedye
The Trouble with 55 is that nobody wanted it,
so it was so widely disobeyed that it became unsafe to drive the speed limit.
Since almost everybody was going over the speed limit, it got
really interesting (and dangerous) when a cop showed up, and
everyone jammed on the brakes and tried to merge behind someone else.
It is not good to turn the majority of drivers into lawbreakers.

There is a better way.

Mandate that all new cars and SUVs come with a real-time readout of MPG,
just like the hybrids do.

Then people will see how much speed is costing them.

Step on the gas and watch the MPG needle dive towards zero.
Back off and watch the mileage go up.

It will also make the abysmal mileage of certain vehicles even
more painfully obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That is an excellent idea.
Make the display very prominent, bright and readable.

People would use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. how is that situation any different than now?
most places, regardless of the speed limit, people go over it. when they see a cop, at least half of them panic and hit their brakes. this didn't change when the speed limit was relaxed, so far as i can tell. the only difference is, now we're doing it ten to twenty mph faster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Some People Speed Now. Practically Everyone Did When it Was 55
It simply wasn't safe to drive 55, even though it was the speed limit,
because so many people were driving faster. Even the trucks in the
slow lane were going faster than 55, and they would go lurching over
into the faster lanes to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. I was surprised to see
that my state - Indiana - just RAISED the speed limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Comparing '74 to '84 with nowadays doesn't jive
Many of today's cars get close to the same mpgs at higher speeds as they do at lower. Besides engine efficiency aerodynamics plays a great role, ever notice how many of the newer cars look the same?
It's because most all of them are designed with aerodynamics for increased mpgs in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is what just happened here in Indiana.
The lawmakers decided to raise the speed limit right around the time the IEA (International Energy Agency?) warned everyone to stop consuming and suggested the Autobahn's speed limit be lowered.

I am living in a whole other world - feels like the Twilight Zone or The Outer Limits. Some people get it, others just go along their merry way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. Time saved vs lives lost
Using Mandated Speed Limits to Measure the Value of a Statistical Life

ORLEY ASHENFELTER
Princeton University - Industrial Relations Section; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
MICHAEL GREENSTONE
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); American Bar Foundation

Abstract:
In 1987 the federal government permitted states to raise the speed limit on their rural interstate roads, but not on their urban interstate roads, from 55 mph to 65 mph for the first time in over a decade. Since the states that adopted the higher speed limit must have valued the travel hours they saved more than the fatalities incurred, this experiment provides a way to estimate an upper bound on the public's willingness to trade off wealth for a change in the probability of death. We find that the 65 mph limit increased speeds by approximately 3.5% (i.e., 2 mph), and increased fatality rates by roughly 35%. In the 21 states that raised the speed limit and for whom we have complete data, the estimates suggest that about 125,000 hours were saved per lost life.

Valuing the time saved at the average hourly wage implies that adopting states were willing to accept risks that resulted in a savings of $1.54 million (1997$) per fatality, with a sampling error that might be around one-third this value. Since this estimate is an upper bound, we set out a simple structural model that is identified by variability across the states in the probability of the adoption of increased speed limits that is consistent with this claim, but it provides estimates of the value of a statistical life that are very imprecise.

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=331463

published by the Journal of Political Economy
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/resolve?id=doi:10.1086/379932
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bush is the biggest hypocrite on the planet
I was looking to buy a 20050 Prius Hybrid, there is a $2000 federal discount. Someone told me that was going away and the feds will be giving up to 10,000 if you buy a pickup or SUV. Anyone else heard of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Several proposals could work in tandem
As mentioned above, have cars include a readout of real-time MPG. Also, raise fuel efficiency standards. Other solutions could be some sort of tax incentive for purchasing hybrids, and more money could be invested in refining hybrid technology to increase power yet maintain fuel efficiency and, if possible, even raise it further in light of increased power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. I can't drive 55
Uh! :banghead:

One foot on the brake and one on the gas, hey!
Well, there's too much traffic, I can't pass, no!
So I tried my best illegal move
Well, baby, black and white come and touched my groove again!
Gonna write me up for 125
Post my face wanted dead or alive
Take my license, all that jive
I can't drive 55!
Oh No!

Uh!

So I signed my name on number 24, hey!
Yeah the judge said, "Boy, just one more...
We're gonna throw your ass in the city joint"
Looked me in the eye, said, "You get my point?"
I said Yeah!
Oh yeah!
Write me up for 125
Post my face wanted dead or alive
Take my license, all that jive
I can't drive 55!
Oh, yeah!

Uh!

When I drive that slow, you know it's hard to steer
And I can't get get my car out of second gear
What used to take two hours now takes all day
Huh!
It took me 16 hours to get to L.A.
Gonna write me up for 125
Post my face wanted dead or alive
Take my license, all that jive
I can't drive 55!
No, no, no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. Blame Reagan: We SQUANDERED the hard work of the '70s
We drove 55, we turned down the heat, we conserved and we built the energy department. By 1984, we were in good shape. Then Reagan abandoned our goals of becoming independent of terrorist oil.

The problems of today are one example of Reagan's poor legacy. We may come through this crisis, but only to experience a worse one in a few years.

The die is cast: Americans will die for ME oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC