"He should give a speech about the nonexistent Saddam/Sept. 11 link.
September 21, 2003
Oh, and by the way, there is “no evidence” that Saddam Hussein was involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
President Bush’s acknowledgement last week was a stark contrast to months of administration suggestions to the contrary — suggestions that helped rev up public support for the war."
<snip>
"The president has many writers who can help him. We imagine a speech that would go something like this:
“My fellow Americans,
“I as much as told you Saddam was one of the culprits in the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. That’s not true.
“I told you he had weapons of mass destruction and was likely to use them. That turns out to be false as well."
<more snipping>
"“You deserve better. From now on I promise to level with you. I pledge to be a president whose words you can trust.”
What about it, Mr. President?"
http://news.statesmanjournal.com/article.cfm?i=68035From a Gannett organ no less. The worm is turning. And the worm is the great sandworm of Dune, SHAI-HULUD.