Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Senate in Blinders (Repug loyality to the Pres)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 05:45 AM
Original message
The Senate in Blinders (Repug loyality to the Pres)



http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/28/opinion/28sat1.html?

May 28, 2005

The Senate in Blinders

John Bolton's nomination to be United States ambassador to the United Nations was put on hold Thursday when Senate Republicans failed to force a vote over Democratic objections. The delay is not exactly a classic filibuster, but a protest against the Bush administration's failure to turn over documents that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee asked for as part of its review of the nomination.

Mr. Bolton was an awful choice for the job before the Senate went away for vacation. He will be an awful choice when the Senate returns. It's unfortunate that this incorrigibly secretive White House is once again stonewalling legitimate requests for documents. But the senators are not exactly working with a shortage of information. They can listen to recordings in which Mr. Bolton expresses contempt for the U. N. They have heard former associates deplore his inability to work well with others, and paint a portrait, as Senator George Voinovich has said, of a "poster child of what someone in the diplomatic corps should not be." The chief of staff for former Secretary of State Colin Powell testified that Mr. Bolton was regarded as so unreliable he was forbidden to make speeches unless they were personally approved by Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.

The senators have also heard compelling reports about Mr. Bolton's habit of pressuring intelligence officers to make their reports fit his own preconceptions about global reality. That includes testimony by former deputy C.I.A. director John McLaughlin that Mr. Bolton had tried to get a top C.I.A. analyst who disagreed with him transferred. It was, Mr. McLaughlin said, the only time in his 32 years in the C.I.A. that he had seen such strong-arming by a policy maker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Funny how everyone is talking about Bolton's public record
...but no one, save Wolcott and Flynt, are talking about his attendance at Plato's Retreat. That's the quiet little fly in the soup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah where's James Dobson on this one
Or on Guckert/Gannon for that matter? Or Neil Horsley? Or David Hager?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. In the buffet line, perhaps, at the NEW Plato's Retreat?
Some may call it CAMP DAVID!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lady lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. My favorite parts of this editorial...
Mr. Bolton was an awful choice for the job before the Senate went away for vacation. He will be an awful choice when the Senate returns.

They have heard former associates deplore his inability to work well with others, and paint a portrait, as Senator George Voinovich has said, of a "poster child of what someone in the diplomatic corps should not be."

The chief of staff for former Secretary of State Colin Powell testified that Mr. Bolton was regarded as so unreliable he was forbidden to make speeches unless they were personally approved by Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.

It is depressing to see how many normally independent Republicans have already put on the blinders. Senator Voinovich, an Ohio Republican, has been waging a gallant and lonely battle to convince other members of his party that they are not obliged to support a desperately unsuitable candidate just because President Bush wants him.

The fault, they should realize, is not in their loyalty. It's in an administration that has failed to deserve it.


What will it take for this Senate to develop some testicular fortitude?








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Two Issues: Treason by GOP, Crimes by Bolton
By permitting the coverup of whatever it is that Bolton did that cannot see the light of day, the Republican legislature is committing treason, high crimes and misdemeanors. Is there no end to this corruption?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC