Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A mother's wrath proves a bigger threat to US hawks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:08 AM
Original message
A mother's wrath proves a bigger threat to US hawks
By Linda S. Heard
Online Journal Contributing Writer
August 19, 2005—When all around you are losing their heads and blaming
your administration then what better antidote than to mosey on down to the
ranch and head for the chainsaw, or so the US President George W. Bush
appears to believe.

After all, out of felled oaks, little policy acorns grow in the Bush upside-down
neo-universe.

Meantime, back on terra firma, the great one's loyal entourage is doing the
rounds of the cable talk-shows, explaining why the leader of the free world is
studiously avoiding bumping into a grieving mother who has been camped
out in a ditch near his fence post or as near to one as burly security guards
allow her to get.

Cindy Sheehan wants nothing more than a few moments of her president's
time to ask him how the loss of her 24-year-old son, Casey, and so many
other sons in Iraq has helped to keep the nation safe.

She may have started her journey to Crawford as an ordinary mom with a
broken heart, but along the way she morphed into a weapon against Bush's
foreign policies more lethal than most.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/081905Heard/081905heard.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. MSNBC has a poll on whether she is being "used" by liberal groups
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually,
It's a poorly worded question. It says "political groups" as if it's pretending it doesn't imply "left" or liberals. But some could take it as the neoCONS using Cindy to bash instead of the anti-war movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Now 63:37 saying "yes" she is getting used.
Getting freeped I suppose. The "good Germans" are talking out their asses once again.

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC