Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mother tips the balance against Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 09:41 PM
Original message
Mother tips the balance against Bush
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 09:42 PM by cal04
Cindy Sheehan's vigil outside the President's ranch has galvanised the anti-war movement - and provoked a vicious political slanging match. Paul Harris reports: Candles were lit all across America last week in one of the largest single anti-war protests in recent US history. At more than 1,600 vigils tens of thousands of protesters gathered in solidarity with the woman who has been the catalyst for the rebirth of the anti-war movement: Cindy Sheehan.
Her remarkable one-woman stand outside George Bush's Texas ranch has turned into a national phenomenon - and one of the most vicious political slanging matches in recent US history.

On the pro-war side, Sheehan has been derided as a traitor to America, betraying her dead soldier son's memory. On the anti-war side she has become a secular saint, laden with the powerful imagery of the avenging mother roused to action. For them, she is the lone soccer mom who is taking on Bush - and winning. Either way, Sheehan is the most talked-about woman in American politics. She might also be Bush's worst public relations nightmare. For months Washington has been awash in speculation of a 'tipping point', when the majority of American public opinion turns finally and permanently against the war. Many now believe that Sheehan has provided that final push. 'It has definitely tipped now,' said Professor Steve Zunes, a political scientist at the University of San Francisco.


Sheehan has undoubtedly exposed deep fractures within the American public. But for every parent of a soldier in Iraq joining her, others have been swift to condemn her campaign. Some parents have travelled to Sheehan's camp to take down crosses commemorating their dead children. One such was Gary Qualls, whose son died in Falluja. 'I find it disrespectful,' he said. A Crawford resident drove his truck over the field of crosses by the roadside. Yet another fired his gun over the heads of the protesters. Yet Sheehan has become the lone voice that kick-started a chorus.

Whether Bush agrees to her demand for a meeting (and it is unlikely he will) is now largely irrelevant. The political legacy left by her summer of protest will last far longer than the ramshackle tents of Camp Casey lining the roads outside Bush's ranch. 'This is now about far more than Cindy Sheehan. She has given people the confidence to speak out about the war that they didn't have before. Finally, its OK in America to be anti-war,' Zunes said.

the whole article
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1553345,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. good article but it has a couple problems
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 10:39 PM by NJCher
First, without a transition from one paragraph to the next, it would lead one to believe that Qualls asked for his son's cross to be removed, which is not the case. The two crazy Larrys are not parents of KIA in Iraq.

A second problem is at the end. The article concludes and then there are quotes. The quotes are not even properly punctuated with ellipses.

Regardless, the article does a good job of showing just how and why Cindy is a big problem for bush right now.


Cher

on edit: I forgot to mention that the paragraph where it discusses the two parents who have shown up to support Cindy is out of date. This writer needs to check out cryptome! Looking at the pictures there, you can see there are many, many parents and loved ones who have shown up. In fact, in reading the captions, I started to lose it because just about every one was a pic of a grieving parent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny... we follow the news and look at the photos of the people who
went to Crawford in support of a mother's need to know.

No matter how much each participant at Crawford benefits and no matter how much we like to know what is going on - no matter how great the words in voice or on the signs.... one thing stands out:

The President isn't there. The President needs a vacation from us.

August 2005 will always be the time of the missing President and the rise of consciousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oda Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. you can tell bush doesn't call the shots
he wouldnt be on vacation in a war we are losing if he could call the shots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Congratulations are your grand faith. Sorry I'm not with you.
I won't get started on my opinion of the character of the man. Let's just say that I BELIEVE he is a vile man whose forté is revenge and betrayal and his Christianity is a sham as I know it.

He said he needs a vacation. Let him have it.

All this good for the country. Concerned citizens are waking up the country (if they stay on track).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC