Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neo-Conservatism: Cult of American Ascendancy or Moral Bankruptcy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 03:42 PM
Original message
Neo-Conservatism: Cult of American Ascendancy or Moral Bankruptcy?
Neo-conservatism: The Cult of American Ascendancy or Moral Bankruptcy?

by Habib Siddiqui

(Saturday November 05 2005)


The modern-day neo-conservatism comes from the far left - a group historically identified as former Trotskyites,<1> and was introduced to America in the 1960s by Professor Leo Strauss of the University of Chicago. The ideas of President Theodore Roosevelt (1901-09) were quite similar to many of the views of present-day neocons.

(snip)

Strauss was an unabashed critic of modern liberalism and was interested in governments taking a greater interest in the problem of human excellence and political virtue. Through his writings, Strauss constantly raised the question of how, and to what extent, freedom and excellence can coexist.<7>

(snip)

Strauss believed Nazism to be a nihilistic reaction to the ungodly and liberal nature of the Weimar Republic. He wanted religion to impose moral law on the masses who would otherwise be out of control. At the same time, he stressed that the rulers need not be bound by it.

(snip)

Strauss, according to Drury, was not as obscure or as esoteric as his admirers pretend. There were certain indisputable themes in his work. The most underlying theme was the distinction between the ancients and the moderns. Drury writes, “According to Strauss, ancient philosophers (such as Plato) were wise and wily, but modern philosophers (such as Locke and other liberals) were foolish and vulgar. The ancients denied that there is any natural right to liberty. Human beings are born neither free nor equal. The natural human condition is not one of freedom, but of subordination. And in Strauss's estimation, they were right in thinking that there is only one natural right - the right of the superior to rule over the inferior - the master over the slave, the husband over the wife, and the wise few over the vulgar many.”<10> This dichotomy requires "perpetual deception" between the rulers and the ruled, according to Drury.

http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/22349

The article includes a long list of neoconservatives (which could also probably be called "a long list of Bush/Cheney administration friends and participants", and a list of their organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. It can't be both?
Morally Bankrupt USAsian Ascendancy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, I guess it can,
although I get the feeling these neocons are in it for themselves, not for America. America just happens to be their home base--considering that they've taken over the government here. That's what happens when people elect a village idiot! We get people taking over the government and stuff! Sheesh!

Jesse Jackson is actually the one who said it best: "Stay outa the Bushes!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC