Republican leaders sat in shock in the House of Representatives as they watched a $142.5 billion spending bill for health and education go down in defeat. It was the worst such loss for the Republican majority in a decade as 22 members stood with a united Democratic Party. The mostly moderate Republicans objected to cuts in popular social welfare programs and, in some cases, the lack of earmarked pork barrel projects. It was not until the dark hours of Friday morning, with the lure of the Thanksgiving recess looming, that party leaders were able to eke out a symbolically important deficit-reduction bill--by two votes. And that came only after Republicans restored money to entitlement programs such as Medicaid and food stamps and appeased moderates by agreeing not to open the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, a top Bush administration priority since he was elected in 2000.
Before the vote, fiscal conservative Rep. Mike Pence (news, bio, voting record)
, an Indiana Republican, framed the debate starkly: "If this bill fails, the Republican revolution is over."It was that kind of week. Accustomed to battling Democrats across the aisle, Republicans have instead taken aim at one another in Congress and across Washington at the White House. A party that has largely marched in lockstep with the President over the past five years--successfully passing tax cuts, a prescription drug plan, and the No Child Left Behind act--now appears to be stumbling on a variety of issues, including an unusual public challenge by the president's own party to the White House's Iraq war policy.
With the president's percentage approval rating in the mid-30s, the lowest point of his presidency, and the war in Iraq proving an albatross for the party, Republicans have started to distance themselves from the Bush administration as they look ahead to the 2006 midterm elections (it may be slight comfort, but polls also show that voters hold an equally dismal view of congressional Republicans and Democrats). The fault lines, present for years, are now more apparent in the absence of the iron-fisted leadership of former Majority Leader Tom DeLay. "The precipitous plunge in the polls for the president has created a great unease among Republicans," says Thomas Mann, a congressional expert at the Brookings Institution. "They now seriously entertain that they could lose their majority in one or both houses of Congress during the midterm elections." That would leave Republicans in a situation similar to the one Democrats faced in the 1994 election when President Bill Clinton's early legislative travails led to a decisive Republican victory.
Hanging over Republicans is the steady erosion of the public's support for the war. A CNN/ USA Today /Gallup poll showed that 63 percent of the public opposes the president's handling of Iraq. The White House tried to go on the offensive and criticize Democrats for questioning the administration's use of prewar intelligence, saying Congress had access to the same data as the president and calling such questions "dishonest and reprehensible." Instead, the White House was forced back on its heels after Republicans in the Senate overwhelmingly joined Democrats, in a 79-to-19 vote, to push the administration for greater oversight of the war--although an earlier effort by Democrats would have been more stringent and required a timetable to withdraw troops.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnews/20051119/ts_usnews/houseofcards
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
