Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dr. James J. Zogby: US bends statistical data on Iraqi surveys

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:33 AM
Original message
Dr. James J. Zogby: US bends statistical data on Iraqi surveys
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 01:43 PM by Skinner
Dr. James J. Zogby: US bends statistical data on Iraqi surveys

20-10-2003

Early in President Bush's recent public relations campaign to rebuild support for the US war effort in Iraq, Vice-President Cheney appeared on "Meet the Press." Attempting to make the case that the US was winning in Iraq, Cheney made the following observation:

There was a poll done, just random in the last week, first one I've seen carefully done; admittedly, it's a difficult area to poll in. Zogby International did it with American Enterprise magazine. But that's got very positive news in it in terms of the numbers it shows with respect to the attitudes to what Americans have done.

One of the questions it asked is: "If you could have any model for the kind of government you'd like to have" - and they were given five choices - "which would it be?" The US wins hands down. If you want to ask them do they want an Islamic government established, by 2:1 margins they say no, including the Shia population.

If you ask how long they want Americans to stay, over 60 per cent of the people polled said they want the US to stay for at least another year.

---snip---

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. They have always done this.
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 03:45 AM by jamesinca
Russert did not call him on it either did he. If two people are in a race, the person who finished last could be said to have finished second and the person who won could be said to have finished second to last. That is all they have done,lots of spin. Technically correct, but misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is not LBN.
As indicated in the URL and at the site, it's an Opinion piece. I'm moving this thread to E&OA.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
TahitiNut - DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC