Absurd's the word: Condoleezza Rice versus Harold Pinter

[seafan]

AS THE WORLD WAKES UP

by Richard Neville
December 9, 2005


It’s happening, isn’t it? The fog is lifting. Enormous shifts of opinion at the last minute. And not just about the wars. About the belief system that sustains the wars, the dark hearts of those who run the wars, the malice of a media that sells the wars.
The climax has been a long time coming and is still unfolding. The Wicked Witch of the West flies to Europe to deliver a major speech, one that explains why US torture isn’t really torture. To deprive a wounded suspect of sleep, stand him in a freezing cell for “long hours”, tie him “feet-up to a water board” and dunk him under water until the brink of death, is within the law. How come? Because President Bush says so. Secret CIA kidnappings in foreign countries are also legal, according to Condoleezza Rice, because anyone loosely deemed an “al-Qaeda affiliate” and “far from their original home” is “effectively stateless” and eligible for kidnap. By this definition Condoleezza herself is “effectively stateless”, as are the agents of the CIA, who are also former al-Qaeda affiliates. Thus, they too can be “legally” abducted and transported to torture chambers.

...

In the same week that British playwright Harold Pinter formally accepts the Nobel Prize for creating his macabre comedy of contradiction, Condoleezza Rice puts the Theatre of the Absurd onto the global political stage. Suddenly, secret renditions and waterboarding are “permissible under international law”, she tells the Germans, who must be astonished. Such techniques didn’t go down so well at Nuremburg.

...

Ironically, at the same time as Condoleezza Rice enters the realm of the absurd, a master of the genre, Harold Pinter, enters the stage as a statesman. Both speeches were delivered in the same week, and are worth comparing.

RICE: The United States and many other countries are waging a war against terrorism. For our country this war often takes the form of conventional military operations in places like Afghanistan and Iraq.

PINTER: The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of international law. The invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of the public; an act intended to consolidate American military and economic control of the Middle East. A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands and thousands of innocent people.

RICE: International law allows a state to detain enemy combatants for the duration of hostilities. Detainees may only be held for an extended period if the intelligence or other evidence against them has been carefully evaluated and supports a determination that detention is lawful.

PINTER: Look at Guantanamo Bay. Hundreds of people detained without charge for over three years, with no legal representation or due process, technically detained forever. This totally illegitimate structure is maintained in defiance of the Geneva Convention. It is not only tolerated but hardly thought about by what's called the 'international community'. This criminal outrage is being committed by a country, which declares itself to be 'the leader of the free world'.

...

(Much more, and very powerful)

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_richard__051209_absurd_92s_the_word.htm

[PDJane]

1. Pinter's speech

Was one of the most powerful and damning speeches I have ever heard. ElBaradei's speech, along with Pinter's, is available on the Nobel website, in both video and print versions.

They are worth watching in their entirety.

[Dunvegan]

2. We're "Through the Looking Glass" aren't we?

...hardly surprising since the Neocons never liked looking themselves in the face in the morning.

Or, is it simply because those profiteering bloodsuckers don't have a reflection anyway?

[seafan]

3. "The Rice doctrine... pushes the art of spin beyond the edge of sanity."

RICE: The United States is a country of laws. My colleagues and I have sworn to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. We believe in the rule of law.

PINTER: The US quite simply doesn't give a damn about the United Nations, international law or critical dissent.

RICE: We consider the captured members of al-Qaeda and its affiliates to be unlawful combatants who may be held, in accordance with the law of war, to keep them from killing innocents.

PINTER: How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice.

RICE: The United States will use every lawful weapon to defeat these terrorists.

PINTER: We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East'.

RICE: Torture, and conspiracy to commit torture, are crimes under US law, wherever they may occur in the world.

PINTER: At least 100,000 Iraqis were killed by American bombs and missiles before the Iraq insurgency began. These people are of no moment. Their deaths don't exist. They are blank. They are not even recorded as being dead. Bush has been clever. He has not ratified the International Criminal Court of Justice.

But, perhaps my favorite quote is this one, because in my heart, it is as truthful as it will ever get.

SO there you have it, the voice of truth, justice and sanity doing battle with the Devil’s spinners. Which voice is which, is for each individual to decide. But once decided, it is up to you to play your part. At this point in history, silence becomes an act of complicity. This is the turning point. The chance won’t come again.