Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This seems to be a rewrite to support Bush's decision to go to wa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-03 08:08 AM
Original message
This seems to be a rewrite to support Bush's decision to go to wa
Edited on Sat Jul-19-03 08:09 AM by Mountainman
While the various agencies agreed that Iraq had "a large-scale" biological weapons program and a more limited chemical weapons program, they were split on nuclear weapons.

The report concluded that Iraq could have produced a nuclear bomb "within several months" if Hussein had been able to buy bomb-making material from other countries. The timeline expanded to between 2007 to 2009 if Iraq had to produce its own highly enriched uranium and other bomb components.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascitystar/6337108.htm

Compare it to this


The excerpts include a conclusion that Baghdad "if left unchecked ... probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade." The documents also cite unsubstantiated reports that Iraq was trying to buy uranium from three African countries: Niger, Somalia and possibly Congo.

"Although we assess that Saddam does not yet have nuclear weapons or sufficient material to make any, he remains intent on acquiring," the intelligence assessment said. Most U.S. intelligence agencies, it continued, "assess that Baghdad started reconstituting its nuclear program about the time that (U.N. weapons) inspectors departed ? December 1998."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030719/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_uranium_24
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC