Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Times article on-line critical of Bush's backpedaling on sign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 11:22 AM
Original message
Army Times article on-line critical of Bush's backpedaling on sign
Edited on Fri Oct-31-03 10:11 AM by Skinner
The Army Times seems to have its ducks in a row when it comes to seeing through the transparencies of the Commander in Thief:

President George W. Bush’s staff played more of a role in the “Mission Accomplished” sign that hung on the carrier Abraham Lincoln than the president suggested yesterday in a Rose Garden press conference.
Bush declared the end of major combat operations in Iraq from the Lincoln’s deck on May 1. Since then about 215 American troops have been killed in action and hundreds more wounded.

The president sought to distance himself from the upbeat message in the banner, explaining at Tuesday’s press conference that the idea for the sign came from the ship’s crew.

“I know it was attributed somehow to some ingenious advance man from my staff — they weren’t that ingenious, by the way,” he said.

Turns out they may have been that ingenious.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT

http://armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2346349.php


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Be sure to check out the comments section.
They're pretty blistering, for the most part.

Thanks for posting this, grannylib!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. No way I believe the "Navy" (whoever that is) requested this.
The WH flacks are fools for image control:


The Peace Bridge - Rebuilt

by MOLLY IVINS

snip

But I was pleased to see that the Stagecraft Administration has already set up the "money shot" for this peace conference, whether any progress is made or not. The New York Times reports the Big Photo-Op is ready to go. The president and the two prime ministers are to appear together on a bridge over the swimming pool behind the King of Jordan's palace.

"White House operatives had the Jordanians build a bridge over the pool, officials said, so that the leaders could walk over the water, side by side, toward the massed cameras. When the first bridge proved too narrow for more than one man to cross at once, the Americans had the Jordanians tear it down and start over, officials said."

This is the kind of attention to detail that got that aircraft carrier turned around so when Bush landed on it, we couldn't see San Diego in the background. Some details are more important than others in this administration.

The Post quotes a (naturally) unnamed official saying of Bush, "He does not have the knowledge or the patience to learn this issue enough to have an end destination in mind." Here's a photo-op idea. If Bush does arrange a lasting peace between Israel and Palestine -- and I am rooting for him -- the White House could take down the bridge yet again and have all three of them walk on the water.

snip

http://www.funnytimes.com/notfunny/20030605MI.html

"The Navy" just got "volunteered" to take the heat for aWol.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freesqueeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. So ... the Sailors on the Ship Requested the Banner that
served the purpose of thanking them for a job well done. I don't think so. A person who would buy this would believe that intentions to develope a weapons program sometime in the future is the same as having the actual weapons.

Don't see how any but the most political could even pretend to believe this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC