opinion piece by Alice Vachss (in W. Post)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49317-2003Oct31.html"You can't argue as many rape cases before a jury as I did during my time as a New York City prosecutor and not understand that our society harbors some deep-seated rape myths -- cultural misconceptions about sexual violence that interfere with our adequately addressing the prevalence of sexual assault. In recent years, most of these rape myths had gone underground, seemingly because it would have been unpopular to express them. ..
"Colorado law permits prosecutors to satisfy their minimal legal burden at a preliminary hearing by offering hearsay evidence. No conscientious prosecutor voluntarily exposes his or her witnesses to unnecessary pretrial cross-examination. Yet when Eagle County Judge Frederick Gannett, in his opinion binding the matter over for trial, made some gratuitous comments complaining about the inherent weakness of such hearsay evidence, the media dutifully reported that the case against Bryant itself was weak. The truth is, we simply don't know the strength of the case, and neither could a judge who heard primarily hearsay. The judge conceded as much in his opinion: "The court understands that the people have no obligation to present all, or even the best of, its evidence at a preliminary hearing, however the court can rule only on what was presented and admitted into evidence." "