Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmaker Worried About Radioactive Fallout from Bomb Test in NV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 12:07 PM
Original message
Lawmaker Worried About Radioactive Fallout from Bomb Test in NV
This topic has also been covered by Rachel Maddow and Randi Rhodes on Air America. The Bush Administration wants to test their underground bunker busting nuclear bomb for use in Iran. However, they are forbidden by treaties from testing nuclear weapons. Therefore, they are going to set off the largest conventional bomb ever to simulate the effects of the new nuclear weapon. The concern is that the blast will create a tall mushroom cloud that may spread radioactive dust from the nearby test sites used in past decades for nuclear bomb tests. The test has been temporarily delayed by a lawsuit. Here's an article:

This topic was also covered in Time Magazine in April.

http://www.gallupindependent.com/2006/apr/041006fallout.html

"Concerns over blast mushroom
Utah lawmaker is worried about fallout from explosion in Nevada

U.S. Rep. Jim Matheson ...wants assurance that a 700-ton blast planned for June 2 at Nevada Test Site will not disperse radioactive remnants from previous nuclear tests into the atmosphere.
Matheson said though he understands that the June 2 "Divine Strake" test is not a nuclear test, "I am greatly concerned that you have not provided the public with adequate assurances that the test is not being conducted in order to further misguided attempts to build new low-yield nuclear devices.

"You are well aware that at 700 tons (595-ton equivalent yield) this demonstration will not simulate an actual conventional bomb because no bomber in the U.S. fleet has the capacity to carry a weapon of this size," he said... Congressmen were concerned in 2003 when Congress "mistakenly repealed" the Spratt-Furse ban on research and development of low-yield nuclear weapons, Matheson said, because they felt that advocates for repealing the ban were yielding to those who actively support the development of new nuclear weapons. At the time, the Department of Defense and the National Nuclear Security Administration assured Congress that the ban should be repealed because it hindered research efforts and that no actual weapon was being stealthily developed.

...Matheson said another cause for concern is that DTRA recently confirmed that Divine Strake is the Tunnel Target Defeat Advanced Concept and Technology Demonstration specified in the agency's FY2007 budget. He said the budget document states that the demonstration"will develop a planning tool that will improve the warfighter's confidence in selecting the smaller proper nuclear yield necessary to destroy underground facilities while minimizing collateral damage." Matheson said, "That sounds like preparation for a low-yield nuclear weapon to me."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Daily Kos's angle on this story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC