Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Administration Failing America’s AIDS Crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Gene C. Gerard Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 10:55 AM
Original message
Bush Administration Failing America’s AIDS Crisis
In 2001 the Bush administration joined 188 other governments
in adopting the United Nations Declaration of Commitment on
HIV/AIDS. This committed each government to improving their
response to its domestic AIDS epidemic and establishing
targets for financing, policy and programming. Last week, in
an address before the United Nations commemorating the 25th
anniversary of the AIDS epidemic, Secretary General Kofi Annan
warned, “The epidemic continues to outpace us. There are more
new infections than ever before.” While we expect third world
nations to have difficulties coping with the epidemic, a new
report suggests that the Bush administration is failing to
adequately combat the crisis in America. 

The Open Society Institute, a public policy research
organization, recently released a comprehensive report on the
state of HIV/AIDS in America. It suggests that President Bush
has failed to effectively handle this devastating epidemic.
Although the Office of National AIDS Policy, located in the
White House, is responsible for domestic efforts to reduce new
infections, it has a tiny staff and little if any authority.
Because the nation lacks a single AIDS authority, the
government hasn’t been able to implement a national plan to
combat the epidemic. 

AIDS funding has been hamstrung under President Bush. The CARE
Act, the government’s major AIDS initiative, had its funding
cut this year. HIV prevention funding for 2006 at the Centers
for Disease Control (CDC) was slashed by $12 million. Last
year, the administration cut $14 million from the Housing
Opportunities for People with AIDS program, which provides
housing subsidies for the poor. Dr. Jim Curran, a former CDC
director, has warned that the nation’s HIV/AIDS policy is
“hampered by insufficient funding.” 

Recent estimates seemingly indicate that one in four infected
with HIV is unaware of their condition. But this is merely an
educated guess, because the Bush administration has never
bothered to conduct annual, nationally representative surveys.
Consequently, policymakers don’t know the full extent of
infection. And the CDC can’t identify pockets of infection
where concentrated interventions are necessary. 

The administration, in an effort to pander to the religious
right, has failed to promote policies to reduce HIV
transmission. Billions of taxpayer dollars have been poured
into abstinence-until-marriage programs. Yet studies
repeatedly show that comprehensive sex education programs help
teenagers delay the onset of sexual activity, increase condom
usage, and reduce their number of sexual partners. Research
has also shown that needle exchange programs help to reduce
transmissions. Yet the Bush administration requires states
receiving HIV prevention funding to agree not to promote drug
use, which is defined to include the exchange programs. 

Although the United States is the world’s leader in AIDS
treatment, approximately half of those infected with HIV are
not receiving regular care. This is partly due to the high
cost of health insurance, which many can no longer afford.
Although President Bush has been in office for six years, he
has yet to deal with the skyrocketing cost of health
insurance. Low Medicaid reimbursement rates, which discourage
physicians from treating the poor, have also contributed to
the lack of treatment. And Medicaid’s eligibility requirements
prevent most of those in the early stages of AIDS from
receiving treatment, because they don’t meet the definition of
“disabled.” 

Federal law prohibits discrimination against those with
HIV/AIDS, yet the Bush administration has done little to
enforce the law. As a result, discrimination is a pervasive
problem. A 2003 study demonstrated civil rights violations
against people living with HIV/AIDS in employment, medical
care, and housing. This has also inhibited access to care and
treatment. 

In recent years AIDS deaths have declined due to new drug
therapies. Yet less than half of those who need drugs are
receiving them. The federal government funds AIDS medication
for the poor through AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAP). But
owing to budget cuts, 26 states that receive ADAP funding
announced earlier this year that they were forced to impose
waiting lists or take other steps to curtail distribution of
the drugs. At least 20 states don’t receive enough ADAP
funding to cover all AIDS medications, and 11 can’t cover the
only drug approved to inhibit HIV. 

While those infected with HIV are far better off in America
than many other countries, it’s clear that the Bush
administration should be doing much more to defeat AIDS. In a
2005 speech President Bush said, “HIV/AIDS is a daily burden
for our families and neighbors and friends.” Mr. Bush has two
more years to demonstrate that he truly understands this. But
many of those living with AIDS do not. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. He has addressed the problem, he gave faith based groups a billion dollars
promote abstanence only education instead of sex education in our school system. He also stoped schools from handing out or talking about condoms. BTW, shrub has also made it illegal for anyone to recomend masterbation as a subsitute for sexual intercourse to young people, so he has done plenty on the AID's problem. At least he has done more then Reagan, who just said AID's was a gay only sickness and would take care of the problem by doing nothing. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melnjones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do you have a source
on the making the recommendation of masturbation illegal thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Penn and Tellers bull shit on HBO, they were talking about this friday
night. The program of abstinence includes masturbation as it is sex even though its without a partner. The goal of the whole program is stopping all sex before marriage. They even had "experts" saying how masturbation leads to temptation so it was best for the kids not to learn anything about it. I know Penn and Teller are comedian's, but their programs do have facts in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cinci_democrat Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. This from b*sh's 2003 State of the Union speech...
Was anything he said he was going to do ever done? I remember listening to this speech shaking my head...

"I propose the Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief -- a work of mercy beyond all current international efforts to help the people of Africa. This comprehensive plan will prevent 7 million new AIDS infections, treat at least 2 million people with life-extending drugs, and provide humane care for millions of people suffering from AIDS, and for children orphaned by AIDS."

"I ask the Congress to commit $15 billion over the next five years, including nearly $10 billion in new money, to turn the tide against AIDS in the most afflicted nations of Africa and the Caribbean."

Full speech:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. One more item to add to the long, long, long list of Dimson's failures
and promises made but never kept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. I lost my partner this year to AIDS, I also have AIDS.
Edited on Sun Jun-11-06 03:41 PM by William769
Trust me, I am well aware of what this misadministration is NOT doing. It's a criminal act!

ON EDIT: Welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for your post. What this means in real time at the local (county)
Edited on Sun Jun-11-06 04:03 PM by pinto
level is that hard choices are having to be made on funding priorities. In California, education and prevention funds have been decimated while the funding needs of CARE Act programs and the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) are increasing...juggling the lack of funds with the need is becoming critically hard for some localities.

There is an unspoken assumption here abouts that in a worse case scenario, ADAP would be saved...at any expense. And California authorities would have to make that choice. Of course, that could see education and prevention funding gutted even further.

You'd think that fiscal conservatives, if there are any left in the Republican majority, would realize the the cost/benefit ratio of preventing AIDS far outweighs the human, medical and financial costs of treatment down the line.

The conservatives' social politics and their goal of dismantling the federal health care infrastructure is what matters to this Administration, not responsible, reality based care and prevention.


(on edit) Great overview, btw. You hit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. every social program has been cut under bush`s rein of terror
city,county,state,and federal social programs have been cut and the money is now given to the churches to spread the word. he could care less who lives and who dies because god has given him the power to chose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. it is "couldn't care less"
and you are indeed correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC