Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boosting the Minimum Wage is a Good Test of Republican Bipartisanship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 04:12 PM
Original message
Boosting the Minimum Wage is a Good Test of Republican Bipartisanship

http://blog.aflcio.org/2006/11/13/boosting-the-minimum-wage-is-a-good-test-of-republican-bipartisanship/

Boosting the Minimum Wage is a Good Test of Republican Bipartisanship

by Mike Hall, Nov 13, 2006

Come January, millions of low-wage American workers have a lot better opportunity to get a raise, with the new Congress expected to propose an increase in the $5.15-an-hour federal minimum wage. The boost will come after more than a decade of inaction and deliberate blocking tactics by Republican congressional leaders and six years of Bush administration opposition.

Last Tuesday, voters not only overwhelmingly approved ballot measures in six states to raise the minimum wage above the federal rate, but voters across the nation said they’d had enough of Republican leadership—especially on economic issues—and gave Democrats control of both the House and Senate.

Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), who authored the most recent Senate version of minimum wage legislation to increase it to $7.25 an hour, says:

Washington wouldn’t act on raising the minimum wage, so America did and now the new Congress will.

The new leaders who will set the congressional agenda when they take over in January are Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), who will be speaker of the House and likely Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.). Both say immediate action on the minimum wage is at the top of their to-do list. In fact, Pelosi says the House will vote on a minimum wage bill in the first 100 hours of the new 110th Congress.

In the current 109th Congress, which now is meeting in a lame-duck session, majorities in both parties have supported a minimum wage increase. But rather than vote on a straight bill increasing the minimum wage, congressional Republicans repeatedly added poison pills such as slashing the estate tax for millionaires and cutting the wages of tipped workers—or refused to allow a simple up-or-down vote on a clear minimum wage bill.

Let’s hope with majorities in both Houses, any Democratic bill won’t be loaded down with such egregious provisions. Already, Arizona Sen. John McCain—who told Tim Russert on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday that he voted against raising Arizona’s minimum wage—says he will not support a clean minimum wage bill in the Senate.

How will President Bush react? In a post-election press conference in which he promised to take a bipartisan approach in working with the new Congress in a bipartisan manner, Bush said he might be able to find “common ground” on a wage increase, but hedged his bets when he suggested “compensation” for businesses as part of a package.

FULL story at link above.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Indeed, it would be nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Pro-Family", "Compassionate Conservatism", "Christian Values"
Do these terms legitimately describe those that self-identify with them, or are they little more than empty rhetoric? We're about to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC