Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Middle Ground (In Politics) By Bob Burnett

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:18 PM
Original message
No Middle Ground (In Politics) By Bob Burnett
Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_bob_burn_061117_no_middle_ground.htm


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 17, 2006

No Middle Ground

By Bob Burnett

The 2006 elections are over and the punditocracy has ruled: The Center is the New Place to Be trumpets TIME magazine. The Middle Muscles In writes David Brooks in the NEW YORK TIMES. It's a classic example of the mainstream media totally missing the point: there was no middle ground in the mid-term elections. There was a reality check.

When voters went to the polls on November 7th, they had only two choices: support a candidate who embraced the failed policies of the Bush Administration-the "stupid" vote. Or, vote for someone who wanted to go in a different direction-the "pragmatic" vote. There was no middle-of-the-road position on the important issues. You were either for sanity or against it.

For most voters, the key election issue was Iraq. It's hard to define a "conservative," "moderate," and "liberal" position on Iraq. For most voters, regardless of Party or professed ideology, there was a stark choice: support the Administration-"stay the course"-or admit the obvious, Bush has lost the war in Iraq and we need to do something more intelligent than "keep on keeping on."

Some pundits claim to discern a conservative position on Iraq, "stay the course," and a liberal position, "cut and run." For these observers, the middle position is anything else. This is misleading, as: very few Democrats-you can count them on the fingers of one hand-advocate immediate withdrawal from Iraq, pulling all of our troops out of the Middle East. There were only two positions on Iraq expressed in the mid-term election: One was the irrational position, held by the Administration and most Republicans: The U.S. still has a chance for victory and the President knows what he is doing. Then there was the realist position, held by everyone else: The Administration lost the war in Iraq and the President not only doesn't have a plan, he doesn't know how to prepare one....

Authors Bio: Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer and Quaker actvist. He is particularly interested in progressive morality and writes frequently on the ethical aspects of political and social issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC