Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gingrich raises alarm at event honoring those who stand up for freedom of speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:47 PM
Original message
Gingrich raises alarm at event honoring those who stand up for freedom of speech
Gingrich raises alarm at event honoring those who stand up for freedom of speech
By RILEY YATES
Union Leader Staff
14 hours, 21 minutes ago


MANCHESTER
– "Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich yesterday said the country will be forced to reexamine freedom of speech to meet the threat of terrorism.


GINGRICH
Gingrich, speaking at a Manchester awards banquet, said a "different set of rules" may be needed to reduce terrorists' ability to use the Internet and free speech to recruit and get out their message.

"We need to get ahead of the curve before we actually lose a city, which I think could happen in the next decade," said Gingrich, a Republican who helped engineer the GOP's takeover of Congress in 1994.

Gingrich spoke to about 400 state and local power brokers last night at the annual Nackey S. Loeb First Amendment award dinner, which fetes people and organizations that stand up for freedom of speech.

............SNIP"

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Gingrich+raises+alarm+at+event+honoring+those+who+stand+up+for+freedom+of+speech&articleId=d3f4ee4e-1e90-475a-b1b0-bbcd5baedd78
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. How do you get "conservatives" to vote for you?
Tell them you want to destroy the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. How UnAmerican Can the GOP Get?
Yeah... just take away our Freedoms Republican Party..... seems to be all you know how to do to fight terrorism. What a bunch of bullshit.... You Nazis always wanted to this shit and terrorism was the perfect excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pondering why they selected him to speak to them? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. because he is the kind of Fascist that represents their wish to destroy the Constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Their? This organization sounds like they are activists for freedom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Freedom of speech in particular is their goal, so it seems?
Newt is definitely running for Pres. He states that the present admin. is not properly dealing with the debacle in Iraq, but, notice, he does not give a clue as to what He thinks is the answer to calming that country. He does the usual repub chicken shit statement, we need to do something different, but, not What to do different.

My opinion? Newt is the one to beat in the Pres election. All the other contenders have even more baggage than he does - - that is one sick Party (Repub)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. i missread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Mabe not? Thom Hartman called them an ultra right wing group?
I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. i heard them called power brokers.. sounded like Fascist pigs to me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gotta Crank Up the Propaganda To Make Sure…
…that the Repiglicans never lose another election.

All their propaganda and all their election fraud still did not keep them in control of Congress.
This is a matter of great concern to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. A "different set of rules"
People have said that as long as the progressive bloggers are around it will be much harder for the RW radicals to keep their secret agendas hidden.

So, the Rethugs in congress are attempting to pass a law that would abandon Net Neutrality to control the internet, which is arguably the last bastion for free speech in America. There has long been a vague undercurrent of "moral disapproval" being generated toward the internet. It is a perception that floats beneath the more obvious anti-blog statements. The Rethugs and their sympathizers have been laying down a systematic smoke screen of doubt and twisted logic to justify their call to limit free speech on the internet.

After all, the root cause of many of the most recent "scandals" has been attributed to the liberal and 'free speech' atmosphere found on the internet... the Foley scandal, the Haggard scandal, the posting of the nuclear blue prints, even liberal political blog sites have been blamed, in part, for the dramatic win of the House and Senate. The RW radicals are subtly making a case for the idea that people can be unduly influenced by what they encounter on the web, (bad!) or that information is overly accessible and that the security risk is too high to allow it to continue.

And so now we hear from Newt "Contract on Amerca' Gingrich, who is 'testing the waters' for his '08 run for the Presidency. Gingrich proposes a 'new set of rules" for the internet to meet "the threat of terrorism"..echos of the Patriot Act..echos of Posse Comitatus, echos of the Military Commissions Act of 2006.

"It is easy to take liberty for granted, when you have never had it taken from you."
-Dick Cheney

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If you loose free speech... al Qaeda won the war on terrorism. Cause
you've turned in on yourself and attacked!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Newt is just giving us a glimpse of his "new" Contract on America
Rethugs already own the media, now all that's left is to stifle the bleating of the proletariat sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. You got it - isn't this a newspaper type award?
The media in general, be it newspapers or tv, are afraid the internet will overpower Their Media. Who got bush's dirty dealing out there for All to see, the internet bloggers!!

They (MSM) have got to shut it (Net) down or lose millions/billions. The internet has begun the mind rape of the masses, yipeee! Truth is out there if people are looking for it by by-passing the MSM. How fun is that?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't think the RW radicals think of the internet as anything but a threat to their plans
May 21, 1999
"There ought to be limits to freedom"- GW Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Once again Gingrich has let us "dummies" know that
we don't know what is good for us and "He" does. Newt just knew in 2000 that he was the chosen one for Pres and then he got caught cheating. What a relief that was for me as he looked like the most likely Repub prospect for Pres and then, we got Bush dumped on us. Newt hasn't given up, I am convinced he believes he is the real "smart" leader of this country. Watch out for Newt as he is like a snake waiting in the grass for his prey. He is a snake!

Newt knows all about Sheeple!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. First they came for the Quakers ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. But we don't have to fix levees before we lose a city...
They'd rather fight nouns than face physical reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
19. Newt, if you want to give up your freedom of speech -- LEAVE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. The old "give me your freedom and I'll give you security" mantra...
no thanks. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC