CorpWatch: High-Tech Health Care in Iraq, Minus the Health Care

[marmar]

High-Tech Healthcare in Iraq, Minus the Healthcare

by Pratap Chatterjee, Special to CorpWatch
January 8th, 2007




cartoon by Khalil Bendib

The convoy of flat-bed trucks picked up its cargo at Baghdad International Airport last spring and sped north-west, stacked-high with crates of expensive medical equipment. From bilirubinmeters and hematology analyzers to infant incubators and dental appliances, the equipment had been ordered to help Iraq shore up a disintegrating health care system. But instead of being delivered to 150 brand-new Primary Health Care centers (PHCs) as originally planned, the Eagle Global Logistics vehicles were directed to drop them off at a storage warehouse in Abu Ghraib.

Not only did some of the equipment arrive damaged at the warehouse owned by PWC of Kuwait, one in 14 crates was missing, according to the delivery documents. The shipment was fairly typical: Military auditors would later calculate that roughly 46 percent of some $70 million in medical equipment deliveries made to the Abu Ghraib warehouse last spring had missing or damaged crates or contained boxes that were mislabeled or not labeled at all.

Not that it really mattered. Just over three weeks before the April 27th delivery, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had canceled the construction of 130 of the 150 PHCs for which the materiel was intended. As a result, the equipment that could help diagnose and treat Iraqi illness (and escalating bomb or gun injuries) now sits idle waiting for someone to figure out what to do with it.

Even if the equipment finally makes it through the bureaucratic logjam, lack of trained personnel to operate it, especially outside major cities, will severely limit its utility. The Army Corps had written a 15-day training plan into the contract, but over time, this had been whittled it down to ten and then to just three days. Iraqi Ministry of Health officials have given up hope that any training at all will accompany the sophisticated equipment.

But if Iraqis have failed to benefit from the idle PHCs, the $70 million contract to supply them has been a shot in the arm for Parsons Global. The Pasadena, California-based engineering company reaped a $3.3 million profit according to an audit report issued by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR), an independent U.S. government agency. And that is in addition to the $186 million that U.S. taxpayers shelled out to Parsons to build dozens of clinics that have yet to dispense a single aspirin.

While the new buildings remain uncompleted and millions of dollars worth of expensive equipment are stored under lock and key, a dwindling number of doctors at existing hospitals perform operations without basic supplies of disinfectant and anaesthesia. A severe shortage of nurses further imperils patient care.

This failed planning and wasted money has been a hallmark of the last three years of healthcare in Iraq. Today the country faces a medical crisis that many say exceeds conditions under sanctions. Compounding this crisis is the violence that creates a steady flow of seriously injured victims. .......(more)

The rest of the article is at: http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=14290

[WHEN CRABS ROAR]

1. How many taxpayers did it take to supply this waste of money?

[WHAT]

2. Sounds like US...

the underlying image of "health care" is similar to walking the Vegas strip...the rewards are tantalizing, but most people don't win. I've come to think low tech health care might be more productive than the flashing advertisements for "bling, bling"; things like hydration, nutrition, sanitation, rest, and security. Not to mention the absence of war and other forms of trauma.

Because I think this is self-evident, I've come to the conclusion that it is deliberate because the higher the bar of expertise is raised the more costly the intervention and the bigger the amount of profit for the least amount of professionals while the majority of people die from lack of care. Thus, the least amount of good can cover the most amount of harm resulting in more death and bigger profits.