Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House passed HR 4's negotiate prices for Medicare Drugs Bill -- but it is flawed (William Chirolas)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 09:26 AM
Original message
House passed HR 4's negotiate prices for Medicare Drugs Bill -- but it is flawed (William Chirolas)
William Chirolas -- World News Trust

Jan. 15, 2007 -- Well, the House has passed HR 4, the Medicare drug reform that that will require Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt to negotiate prices on behalf of 29.4 million Medicare recipients, but leaves out the structure that allows that negotiation to result in lower prices -- the structure the Veteran's Administration uses for drug purchases, an approach that has been so successful in getting a lower price for drugs in that system.

Tony Snow is quoted last week as saying that the actuaries (and I am an actuary) at both the budget office and the Department of Health and Human Services say the bill will have little or no effect on federal spending and provide no substantial savings to the government.

And indeed CBO estimates that H.R. 4 would have a negligible effect on federal spending because they assume the Secretary would be unable to negotiate prices across the broad range of covered Part D drugs that are more favorable than those obtained by PDPs under current law, because the legislation specifically directs the Secretary to negotiate only about the prices that could be charged to PDPs, and explicitly indicates that the Secretary would not have authority to negotiate about some other factors that may influence the prescription drug market, we assume that the negotiations would be limited solely to a discussion about the prices to be charged to PDPs.

Given that the Secretary is not allowed to establish a formulary, there is little ability to encourage the use of particular drugs by Part D beneficiaries, so there is little leverage to obtain significant discounts.

more

http://www.worldnewstrust.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=812
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. A good negotiator would be able to do the job! If the current
HHS Sec. can't or won't, then fire him and get someone who can and will do the job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC