Exit Strategy - David Podvin

[pberq]

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/19004

Exit Strategy
Tue, 2007-02-27 17:25.

By David Podvin, Make Them Accountable

When George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13303 that effectively transferred Iraqi oil into American custody it constituted history’s greatest acquisition of wealth. Iraq contains proven oil reserves of 115 billion barrels, and geological surveys indicate that a similar amount of unconfirmed petroleum deposits exist. At current prices, the oil that lies beneath the Iraqi sand is worth approximately fourteen trillion dollars.

If America were to leave Iraq it would constitute history’s greatest forfeiture of wealth, so America will not leave. Although the Democrats are saying the United States must withdraw sooner and the Republicans are saying the United States must withdraw later, it is performance art worthy of Oscar consideration. The American military isn’t going anywhere. Not sooner. Not later. Not ever. America’s exit strategy is to stay, which explains why hugely expensive military bases are being constructed throughout Iraq. The world’s only superpower did not build its financial juggernaut by being the type of impetuous nation that repudiates fourteen trillion dollars.

American soldiers are permanently stationed in more than a hundred countries, so Iraq will be just one more. At some point America will bring the troops home from the Iraqi War in the same way that the troops were recalled from World War II, meaning some of the soldiers will be repatriated while others remain positioned to protect business interests. This scenario will occur because when big money is involved democracy goes on sabbatical. It has been said that had Al Gore won the 2000 election America would not have invaded Iraq, but Al Gore did win the 2000 election and America did invade Iraq. No matter who wins the next election the United States military will grace the Iraqi landscape until the Apocalypse arrives or petroleum becomes worthless.

For the corporatists who run America, the immediate challenge is to craft a plausible narrative that justifies remaining in the Iraqi quagmire. “We stole their oil and fully intend to keep it!” is a substandard patriotic rallying cry. “Their invisible weapons of mass destruction imperil our little children!” has already been tried and found lacking. “It is all about democracy!” now elicits cringes even from the few deceivers still sufficiently brazen to utter the words. “If we don’t fight them over there we will have to fight them over here!” is an unsettling declaration since it focuses attention on the ominous fact that they are outfighting us over there. And so, the strategy is to find another exigent situation requiring military action.

(more . . .)

[Parisle]

1. Geat piece....

--- Podvin is one of our best observers/interpreters of modern political events.....

[pberq]

2. No ground forces needed for Iran

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/19004

. . .Legitimate cause exists to insure that Iran does not acquire the Iraqi oil. Doing so would give the Iranians considerable influence on the world economy and enable them to advance their jihadist agenda. Of course, the only reason Iran perceives a chance to grab Iraqi oil is that Bush destabilized Iraq. The common denominator of each Bush decision has been that it furthers the interests of the petroleum industry, which would dearly love to see $100 per barrel oil posthaste. Attaining that goal will require attacking Iran.

Therefore, Corporate America will have its Madison Avenue subsidiary regenerate war fever. It should not be a hard sell. The American people love war…on average, the United States has engaged in a new armed-conflict every nine years. Americans are dissatisfied with the Iraq War only because they hate losing, so Republicans can rebound from the Iraqi misadventure by crushing Iran. This calculation embodies the true Reagan Doctrine: after being humiliated in Lebanon, the Gipper transformed defeat into victory by routing Grenada and the GOP won the next election.

While Iran is no Grenada, it is also no match for the American colossus. Although the Iranians have substantial ground forces the United States does not need to engage them. The probable strategy consists of disabling Iran’s Russian-supplied air defense system and then bombing Tehran into submission. The U.S. military required an infantry offensive to conquer Iraq only because the Air Force pulled its punches. When America’s flyboys are unrestrained, they provide conclusive firepower. Ask the Japanese.