Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US: Stop the Guantanamo Circus (Human Rights Watch)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:58 PM
Original message
US: Stop the Guantanamo Circus (Human Rights Watch)
Source: Human Rights Watch

US: Stop the Guantanamo Circus

Hicks Pleads Guilty; New Detainee Arrives

(Guantanamo Bay, March 27, 2007) – Two defense lawyers for Guantanamo
detainee David Hicks were barred from representing their client yesterday,
highlighting the failure of US military commissions to meet fair trial standards,
Human Rights Watch said today. Hicks, the first person to be charged before
the military commissions authorized by Congress in 2006, pleaded guilty
to a single criminal charge.

Hicks’ plea came as the Defense Department announced the transfer of a
new detainee to Guantanamo. The Kenyan detainee, taken into custody in
Kenya, appears to be a criminal suspect who belongs in civilian criminal
court.

“The antics at the Hicks hearing underline the illegitimacy of the
Guantanamo tribunals,” said Jennifer Daskal, advocacy director of the US
Program at Human Rights Watch and an observer at the hearing.

Hicks’ two civilian defense counsel were prevented from representing him
as his hearing got underway on March 26. The presiding judge provisionally
dismissed the assistant defense counsel, stating that the government was
precluded from assigning civilian government employees to represent
defendants, even though military commission rules allow the Department
of Justice to assign its civilian lawyers to the prosecution. The judge
then removed Joshua Dratel, Hicks’ longtime civilian counsel, because he
agreed to abide by all “existent” rules, but refused to agree to “all” rules
for the tribunal without first knowing what those rules stated. According
to the judge, this ran afoul of civilian counsel’s obligations to agree to
military regulations governing representation – regulations which have not
yet been issued.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2007/03/27/usdom15572.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Impeach the whole lot of them. This is beyond illegal; it is uncon-
scionable! The Bush government is mad up of incompetent sociopaths and they have adversely affected anyone in their path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC