Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Majority of Iraqi Lawmakers Now Reject Occupation (AlterNet)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 06:18 AM
Original message
Majority of Iraqi Lawmakers Now Reject Occupation (AlterNet)
Majority of Iraqi Lawmakers Now Reject Occupation

By Raed Jarrar and Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted May 9, 2007.



More than half of the members of Iraq's parliament rejected for the first time on Tuesday the continuing occupation of their country. The U.S. media ignored the story.

On Tuesday, without note in the U.S. media, more than half of the members of Iraq's parliament rejected the continuing occupation of their country. 144 lawmakers signed onto a legislative petition calling on the United States to set a timetable for withdrawal, according to Nassar Al-Rubaie, a spokesman for the Al Sadr movement, the nationalist Shia group that sponsored the petition.

It's a hugely significant development. Lawmakers demanding an end to the occupation now have the upper hand in the Iraqi legislature for the first time; previous attempts at a similar resolution fell just short of the 138 votes needed to pass (there are 275 members of the Iraqi parliament, but many have fled the country's civil conflict, and at times it's been difficult to arrive at a quorum).

Reached by phone in Baghdad on Tuesday, Al-Rubaie said that he would present the petition, which is nonbinding, to the speaker of the Iraqi parliament and demand that a binding measure be put to a vote. Under Iraqi law, the speaker must present a resolution that's called for by a majority of lawmakers, but there are significant loopholes and what will happen next is unclear.

What is clear is that while the U.S. Congress dickers over timelines and benchmarks, Baghdad faces a major political showdown of its own. The major schism in Iraqi politics is not between Sunni and Shia or supporters of the Iraqi government and "anti-government forces," nor is it a clash of "moderates" against "radicals"; the defining battle for Iraq at the political level today is between nationalists trying to hold the Iraqi state together and separatists backed, so far, by the United States and Britain.

...(snip)...

But public opinion is squarely with Iraq's nationalists. According to a poll by the University of Maryland's Project on International Public Policy Attitudes, majorities of all three of Iraq's major ethno-sectarian groups support a unified Iraq with a strong central government. For at least two years, poll after poll has shown that large majorities of Iraqis of all ethnicities and sects want the United States to set a timeline for withdrawal, even though (in the case of Baghdad residents), they expect the security situation to deteriorate in the short term as a result.

That's nationalism, and it remains the central if unreported motivation for many Iraqis, both within the nascent government and on the streets.
.....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/51624/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. kicked and recommended...
for the Truth, damnit! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Over half of Iraq's parliament and U.S. congress oppose continued occupation - so work together.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is how Bush teaches democracy, one man, one vote
and he's the one man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. vote this up on Buzzflash.net--once it hits their front page, it will get a lot more notice LINK
and this is a story that needs to elbow its way into the debate.

http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=12785
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socretes73 Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for the way to spread this
the American Press is TREASONOUS for not making this page 1..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. spreading it wider & deeper LINKS
Edited on Thu May-10-07 08:29 PM by yurbud
netscape
http://donoevil.netscape.com/story/2007/05/09/majority-of-iraqi-lawmakers-now-reject-occupation

Digg
http://digg.com/politics/Majority_of_Iraqi_Lawmakers_Now_Reject_Occupation

yahoo answers
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Av5.vI9l1oAlsbR014OHWC3sy6IX?qid=20070509211649AAz6juV

It's not letting me post a complete link to yahoo answers, so click on the one above, and paste this question into the search

"Should Bush obey Iraqi vote on US withdrawal?"


or ask a new question of your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. gee, yah think somebody ought to tell Jr this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC