Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP editorial: "An account of Bush administration lawlessness so shocking it would be unbelievable...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 02:31 AM
Original message
WP editorial: "An account of Bush administration lawlessness so shocking it would be unbelievable...
from a less reputable source."

*

Mr. Comey's Tale
A standoff at a hospital bedside speaks volumes about Attorney General Gonzales.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007; Page A14

JAMES B. COMEY, the straight-as-an-arrow former No. 2 official at the Justice Department, yesterday offered the Senate Judiciary Committee an account of Bush administration lawlessness so shocking it would have been unbelievable coming from a less reputable source. The episode involved a 2004 nighttime visit to the hospital room of then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft by Alberto Gonzales, then the White House counsel, and Andrew H. Card Jr., then the White House chief of staff. Only the broadest outlines of this visit were previously known: that Mr. Comey, who was acting as attorney general during Mr. Ashcroft's illness, had refused to recertify the legality of the administration's warrantless wiretapping program; that Mr. Gonzales and Mr. Card had tried to do an end-run around Mr. Comey; that Mr. Ashcroft had rebuffed them.

Mr. Comey's vivid depiction, worthy of a Hollywood script, showed the lengths to which the administration and the man who is now attorney general were willing to go to pursue the surveillance program. First, they tried to coerce a man in intensive care -- a man so sick he had transferred the reins of power to Mr. Comey -- to grant them legal approval. Having failed, they were willing to defy the conclusions of the nation's chief law enforcement officer and pursue the surveillance without Justice's authorization. Only in the face of the prospect of mass resignations -- Mr. Comey, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III and most likely Mr. Ashcroft himself -- did the president back down....

***

The dramatic details should not obscure the bottom line: the administration's alarming willingness, championed by, among others, Vice President Cheney and his counsel, David Addington, to ignore its own lawyers. Remember, this was a Justice Department that had embraced an expansive view of the president's inherent constitutional powers, allowing the administration to dispense with following the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Justice's conclusions are supposed to be the final word in the executive branch about what is lawful or not, and the administration has emphasized since the warrantless wiretapping story broke that it was being done under the department's supervision.

Now, it emerges, they were willing to override Justice if need be. That Mr. Gonzales is now in charge of the department he tried to steamroll may be most disturbing of all.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/15/AR2007051501945.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. the really sad part is it's not shocking to anyone
especially those of us at DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. If this means it's finally hit the WP with a two-by-four to the noggin...
it's welcome news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deeply saddening, but alas, not shocking.
The WaPo has finally noticed the government is being run by thugs? Good. Now let's see what they do with it.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've read this account here in the past. No surprise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. and this folks------is the reason why bush has confidence on Gonzo:
Now, it emerges, they were willing to override Justice if need be. That Mr. Gonzales is now in charge of the department he tried to steamroll may be most disturbing of all.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Huh. Who wrote this? Is this the Wapo's staff's editorial or a guest editorial?
Edited on Wed May-16-07 06:16 AM by electron_blue
If it's meant to be the opinion of *the* editor at Wapo, why isn't it signed? I'm wondering why the editorial staff feels so strongly about the lawlessness of the Bush administration to write such an editorial, yet, gives him 'byes' almost daily on their front page.

Never mind - I see they do have a companion piece to this story on their front page. Well done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's the Washington Post editorial, and that is why it is not signed.
Only guest articles on editorial pages are signed in newspapers. The lack of a signature is meant to convey that this is the opinion of the newspaper, not one individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Took Them Long Enough!
We had word of this YEARS ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No kidding
I wonder when they'll figure out Bush lied about Saddam's WMD's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. What's this? A news paper reporting on the government?
I can't imagine such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Any word as to why Ashcroft didn't tell the American people about this
IMMEDIATELY!?

How many years ago was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Comey understood this reality when he gave Fitz all the powers of the AG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hey WP, PUT UP OR SHUT UP!
I expect screaming front page headlines from now until something is done about this. How about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. WHAT TOOK YOU POST TOASTIES SO LONG TO FIGURE THIS OUT?
Yeesh, can anyone at the Whoreshington Post FINALLY stop kissing Bush's ass?

Is that too much to ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC