A Policy Poisoned by Money": An Interview With Greg Palast

[Dirty Hippie]

This is an excellent interview. Clearly outlines how and why the Bush Administration is failing to protect the citizens of this country against terrorism.

...
So what's happened is that you have a foreign policy poisoned by money. Bush is saying, "Don't investigate my friends." In fact, some of these people, like Bahksh, are under investigation by European intelligence agencies for sponsoring Al Qaeda, although sometimes unknowingly. Al Qaeda runs a shakedown operation, but that's details. A lot of it is this: "We don't bother the Saudis, they're our friends, they're our buddies, they provide our oil." Well, the Saudis have not been our buddies, they've been George W. Bush's buddies. They're not my buddies, especially when they're funding people that attacked the United States. I worked in the World Trade Center; they attacked my building. Fifteen of those nineteen hijackers were Saudis, but we attacked Iraq without one shred of evidence that there was any connection between Hussein and Al Qaeda. Saddam Hussein, a horrible guy, but still.



And now they're selling us on Iran's connection to Al Qaeda. Keep this in mind: the United States was not Al Qaeda's first target. Their first target was Iran; almost no one knows or understands that in America. They hate the Iranians. Al Qaeda slaughtered the Iranian embassy delegation in Afghanistan; they came in and machine-gunned everyone. Iran is their number one target, because they are Shi'ites, and considered to be horrible apostates. The idea that the Iranian government has anything to do with Al Qaeda is insane. The Saddam Hussein thing was off the wall, but we're going to fight a government that hates Al Qaeda even more than we do. Now, Iran is a fascist Islamic government that should be deposed -- by their own people. Like I said, you pick up the paper, and you're ready to tear your hair out.

...


http://www.morphizm.com/recommends/interviews/palast_money.html

[DemBones DemBones]

1. Palast is always good. Thanks for the link. This bit was

heartening (and supports my opinion that no one should be ruled out as "unelectable" at this point.):

". . . Think about this: Clinton was utterly unknown. No one would run against Bush Sr. in 1992, because he was the Desert Stormtrooper. He was supposed to be invincible, and all the Democrats could find was some philanderer from Arkansas, and that's how we ended up with Bill Clinton. . ."