Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some Cleared Guantanamo Inmates Stay in Custody-Lawyers call US system of hearings a sham

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 05:29 PM
Original message
Some Cleared Guantanamo Inmates Stay in Custody-Lawyers call US system of hearings a sham
Some Cleared Guantanamo Inmates Stay in Custody
Lawyers call US system of hearings a sham
by Farah Stockman

GUANTANAMO BAY - About a quarter of detainees who were cleared to leave Guantanamo Bay prison after hearings in 2005 and 2006 remain in custody, raising questions among inmates and their lawyers about the legitimacy of the system of hearings to review evidence against the prisoners.1119 03

The military’s failure to release all of those who were cleared to leave - combined with the fact that dozens of other inmates who were not cleared have nonetheless been released - has led many inmates and their lawyers to contend that the system is a sham, and that the real decisions are being made elsewhere.

The military says most of the cleared inmates remain in custody because of difficulties in negotiating terms of their release to their home countries. But officials also acknowledge that the hearings are not the final decision on an inmate’s fate, and that the Pentagon retains the power to hold even those who have been cleared by the three-officer panels who review the inmates’ cases.

The system of hearings was enacted after the Supreme Court insisted inmates be given a chance to present evidence and argue for their release. The court did not specify what procedures should be used, but required that in mates get a chance to argue for their freedom.

Next month, the high court will review the system, and the fairness of the hearings will be a major point of contention. In the government’s brief, it cites annual reviews as part of its argument that detainees “enjoy more procedural protections than any other captured enemy combatants in the history of warfare.”

But the detainees and their lawyers see it differently. According to Pentagon statistics, 10 percent of the prisoners chose to attend their hearings this year. In 2004, more than 60 percent had chosen to attend. The dramatic falloff, lawyers say, is because the inmates do not trust the system.

“It’s pretty clear the process is a sham,” said Ramzi Kassem, a member of the clinical faculty at Yale Law School who represents an Algerian detainee cleared more than two years ago. “There’s strong evidence that the hearings are meaningless.”

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/11/19/5329/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm really glad for this, that it has come to light. One more good reason
.. for the US Courts to step in and declare these "Hearings" to be the sham they are, and put ALL detainees under
US Court system, period. It couldn't happen too soon for me, and I"m sure for the poor hapless innocent detainees
who are being fucked with royally in our name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was watching 60 minutes last night and they had a story on the youngest
inmate of Gitmo. They somehow implied that when the wars are over in the middle east the enemy combatants will have to be released (don't know if putting them on trial would stop this). Sure gives one pause as to why the *WH wants a long war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC