Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Philly Inquirer blasts Cheney/Scalia (Editorial and Auth Cartoon)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:40 AM
Original message
Philly Inquirer blasts Cheney/Scalia (Editorial and Auth Cartoon)
Feb. 11, 2004
Editorial | Cheney and Scalia
So that's why it's called a duck 'blind'

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/7923626.htm

Two old pals took a duck-hunting trip to Louisiana last month, and now one of them is in the soup.

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was the guest of Vice President Dick Cheney - and American taxpayers - aboard Air Force Two.

snip>

Several respected legal ethicists agree: Scalia should recuse himself from the Cheney energy-policy case because, as the federal law on judicial recusals states, "his impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

Scalia says he has no intention of doing so, which shows that even a brilliant legal mind is capable of compounding one faux pas with another. It's not as though the justice never acknowledges conflict of interest; he's recused himself many times from cases in which his son, who works for the Labor Department, was involved.

more>

Plus the Tony Auth cartoon on the same page:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's funny...
He never recused himself from Bush v. Gore when at least one of his sons was on Shrub's legal team...I see a pattern emerging...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. Fat Tony Scalia is NOT a judge
(not by the "strict definition" of the term at least)

He is a political operative, plain and simple, which along with his 2nd vote, the malleable Clarence "Slappy" Thomas (My God, what must Thurgood Marshall be thinking up in heaven when he looks down to see this moral and intellectual dwarf sitting in his seat!), is to support the Emperor and toss key decisions the Imperial way without regard for what the law actually says.

Which is why Fat Tony could give a shit about judicial codes of ethics and such.

The only people foolsih enough to think he cares about them are the same poeple foolish enough to think he is a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. What was it that Scalia said to the Nat'l Press Club
when he wouldn't allow himself to be recorded? Something in regard to the Patriot Act like: "Americans have far more rights than they really need..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Duck hunting issue brought up tonite on ABC
Jennings was tapping his fingers while reporting the segment. I wonder what that means when that is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. brilliant legal mind? Scalia?
Please- he is an RNC hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC