Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EVERYBODY KNOWS...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:21 PM
Original message
EVERYBODY KNOWS...
Everybody knows that the dice are loaded.
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed.
Everybody knows the war is over.
Everybody knows the good guys lost.
Everybody knows the fight was fixed.
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich.
That's how it goes. Everybody knows.
~~Leonard Cohen



The fate of millions was sealed the moment Dick Cheney selected himself as The Destroyer whose charge to keep for the next eight years would be -- as Capitol Hill Blue's Doug Thompson so succinctly described George W. Bush -- a "criminally insane, pill-popping dry drunk." I don't know about that. I've seen some drunks in my time -- even dry ones -- and George Bush appears to be more than a little moist.

Bush was the perfect foil for Cheney. The Scalia-driven 2000 election coup catapulted Bush to the top of the political heap. For the first time in his worthless, impotent, cruelly indifferent life, Bush was suddenly important -- the most powerful man on the face of the earth -- and all because he had been told to scream, "Jezus! Jezus is my philosopher!" to the swooning masses. Makes one wonder at the rigid consent of those same "believers" for the ensuing slaughter of so many innocents -- when murdering even one in the name of Jesus should have sent a collective shriek reverberating throughout the religious universe. (See Matthew 18:14; Mark 9:42; Luke 17:2)

Everybody knows that Bush isn't remotely qualified to be at the helm of the world's superpower. He can neither think nor speak coherently, can recognize little other than Texas on a map, has completely torpedoed every business venture he attempted, and admittedly was a hard-partying sot until he was 40. Cheney was another matter. He was a household word. He had been a public servant throughout his career. He served as President Gerald Ford's chief of staff, earned six terms in the House of Representatives where he ascended to the position of minority whip and, finally, was the elder Bush's Secretary of Defense.

We trusted Cheney to keep Bush from making rash decisions. Was it not Cheney who, at the conclusion of the 1991 Desert Storm assault, made the assessment that to expand the exercise to include regime change in Iraq was not morally sustainable because of the chaotic bloodletting -- the needless toll on our uniformed military?

We were wrong. Had we bothered to check the "other priorities" that allowed Cheney to dodge the draft five times on his rise to power, his chilling congressional voting record, his efforts to enrich the military industrial complex by privatizing defense duties and granting massive contracts to Halliburton, we would have known that Cheney was consumed with lust for power and money. We would have known Cheney had been champing at the bit for more than a decade to impose a new order wherein the American Empire controls the world and its resources.

Had we checked, we would have known Dick Cheney was the wrong babysitter for a kid who gets his jollies by blowing things up.

Cheney Unbound

In 1991, Cheney was in the wrong place at the wrong time. But the upheaval of the following decade, the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress, and the expanding manipulative power of the corporate media created the axis of corruption necessary for a Cheney reign of terror. Cheney was ready, as were the militant warmongers of the Project for the New American Century who had been demanding Saddam Hussein's head for years. At least 12 of the 18 co-signers of the January 1998 letter to President Bill Clinton, and another letter four months later to then House Speaker Newt Gingrich, demanding the overthrow of Saddam were given key positions on Cheney's destructive team.

The fix was in. Four days before the 2001 inauguration, PNAC's deputy director, Thomas Donnelly, wrote a memorandum to "Opinion Leaders," reminding them that "the task of removing Saddam Hussein’s regime from power still remains...Many in the incoming Bush Administration understand this challenge..."

Four months after the inauguration, the White House issued a press release warning that the threat of terrorist-nations using weapons of mass destruction against the American "homeland" was very real. To counter this danger, Cheney put himself in charge of the entire government -- departments of Defense, Justice, Health and Human Services, Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, FEMA, and "other federal agencies," which would naturally include both FAA and NORAD. A new department -- the Office of National Preparedness -- was created so Cheney could protect us from catastrophic harm and deal with "consequence" management.

The next four months were busy ones. With malicious indifference, Cheney set about screwing the American people; destroying 225-year Constitutional protections, passing secret laws to seize unlimited executive power, and locking both Congress and the public out of the legislative process. Bush provided cover by regaling us with hilarious "Benny Hill" bits of linguistic derring-do, strutting from one presidential photo op to another, falling off couches and bicycles, choking on pretzels, and attacking brush with a chainsaw at his Crawford ranch.

Cheney in Charge

Then it was 9-11. Suddenly Bush was no longer a spoiled, bumbling, schizophrenic little president. In an instant, he was transformed into a loaded codpiece -- The Commander in Chief, The Decider of life and death -- a modern-day Caligula towering above mankind with lighted depleted uranium firecrackers gripped in both fists. Cheney could not have picked a more willing accomplice to export death and violence to the four corners of the earth...

With smoke still rising from the ashes of Afghanistan, the drive to topple Saddam, who was demanding Euro for his oil, quickly turned into a crusade. It was Cheney-orchestrated and Cheney-driven. Under the deepening shadows of mushroom clouds, administration neoconservatives teamed up with ecstatic corporate media co-conspirators to terrify an already traumatized public. Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith launched a separate intelligence unit, the Office of Special Plans, to create the propaganda needed to invade Iraq.

Since Bush can't be trusted to maintain a single train of thought in one-on-one interviews, he hit the campaign trail with a prepared speech he delivered over and over -- is now delivering about Iran -- frantically catapulting the propaganda that Saddam was "threatening America and the world with horrible poisons and diseases and gases and atomic weapons." Bush convinced a majority of Americans that the Iraqi dictator was allied with Al Qaeda and provided a "safe haven" for terrorists, and if we didn't wipe him out, he would "strike us again without leaving any fingerprints."

Cheney's fingerprints are all over every aspect of the drive for war. For a year and a half, Cheney bullied the entire intelligence apparatus, especially the CIA, into making a false case that Saddam was an immediate nuclear threat. He denigrated the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report that there was no evidence, sneering that the intelligence was faulty, and IAEA Director-General Mohammed El-Baradei had no credibility where Iraq was concerned.

But it was Secretary of State Colin Powell who rolled the loaded dice at the UN Security Council on February 8, 2003, in a presentation even he admitted was "bullshit." Powell, who is adept at leaving no fingerprints, but whose shadow lingers over decades of slaughtered innocents, carried the water for his masters one last time. When Powell completed his somber charges that Al-Qaeda was in Iraq running "poison camps" full bore, that Saddam was obtaining magnets for uranium enrichment -- charges backed up with photos and vials of poison -- we were sold. Because we trusted him.

A Moral Fork in the Road

I don't want to go off on an Aristotelian rant here, but thanks to Cheney and those around him obsessed with world government, this nation appears to be running on empty where morality, or ethos, is concerned. Values such as compassion, sympathy, prudence, virtue, decency, ethics -- cannot thrive in a nation controlled by war criminals who force its citizens into submission through fear, violence and propaganda. How can a society be "just" when natural laws have fallen by the wayside and nobody is held accountable for crimes against God and humanity?

We are under the control of the criminally insane. Cheney has turned the greatest democratic republic ever conceived into a world corporation and anointed himself its Chief Executive Officer (CEO). He has supplanted two centuries of protections afforded by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights with executive orders and secret laws. In their lust for power and riches, Cheney and Bush have managed in just seven grueling, sadistic, morally corrupt years to destroy entire nations, including their own. And they accomplished this in the only way possible. Because we permitted it. Because we lost our moral compass.

So we stand here in the blood-sodden mess of two lost wars. Millions -- millions -- have been displaced, destroyed, dishonored in Cheney's quest for oil. Tens of thousands of our own citizens are injured, maimed -- 4,077 dead -- an entire generation of Americans lost in a depleted uranium wasteland. "So?" Cheney says, "They were all volunteers." He admitted that losing sons or daughters could "be a burden" on families, but reminded us sternly that "the biggest burden" is on the President, who has to send even more to their deaths.

We're at the crossroads. We can no longer remain neutral nor mill around in confused acceptance of the genocidal madness into which we have been swept. Thomas Jefferson said, "When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."

Everybody knows the folly of the treasonous "corrections" made to counter the Iran-Contra evil in the 1980's and early '90's -- the flurry of Presidential Christmas-Eve pardons allowing convicted criminals to recede into the shadows only to return and metastasize throughout the current Cheney/Bush administration.

Cheney, Bush and their co-conspirators throughout the three branches of government must be removed. Indicted. Convicted. Imprisoned. Voting records of the 435 members of Congress and 33 Senators up for re-election in 2008 must be vetted, and those who do not reflect the will of the people must go. No exceptions. The remaining 17 Senators must either stand or fall on their voting records. If those who are guilty of the same breach of trust as their cohorts refuse to budge, they must be impeached and removed from office.

They have left us with but one choice, and one last chance to make that choice. We have reached a point in the "course of human events" where it is not only our "right but our duty" to throw off this destructive government and institute one which remembers it "derives its just powers from the consent of the governed."

The time has come for Americans to blink. Because the Abyss is staring back at us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Off to the GREATEST with you!!! Damned good!

Wake up America!:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent!!
This needs to be read by EVERYONE and should be an OP in a major newspaper if you can get it published.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. And I've definitely bookmarked this!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. To Raster and NotGonnaTakeIt...
Thank you so much! As Stinky W. would say, "Ah 'preshate it..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well done indeed; this is so timely! Bookmarked, recommended,
kudos, thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thank you so much, grannylib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. WOW! Kick and Recommended
You don't post often, but you post good.

One of the best threads I've read in a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. My problem is...
...I'm an obsessive researcher. I have every day of this treasonous administration on file. Four filing cabinets stuffed full, two tables with stacks and stacks of articles...I can't find anything when I need it, but by golly, I've got it...LOL

I'll try to do better. Before I got this really really neat computer and all those filing cabinets, I wrote about two articles a month. Now it's two months to an article. Go figger...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Please keep it up! Your material is well-written and well-researched.
My hat is tipped...thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Keep up the good work.
We love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. I can sympathize

I have stacks of paper everywhere too, and some is even in a filing cabinet.
:)

Great article, must add to my favorite stack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Great piece Sheila
K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thank you, BushDespiser12...
Hey -- I like the sound of that! BUSHDESPISER...BUSHDESPISER...Music to my ears...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. There's a parallel here to Kitty Genovese

"Suddenly, the man overtook her and grabbed her. She screamed. Residents of nearby apartment houses turned on their lights and threw open their windows. The woman screamed again: ``Oh, my God, he stabbed me! Please help me!''"

"A man in a window shouted: ``Let that girl alone.'' The attacker walked away. Apartment lights went out and windows slammed shut. The victim staggered toward her apartment. But the attacker returned and stabbed her again."

``I'm dying!'' she cried.

"Windows opened again. The attacker entered a car and drove away. Windows closed, but the attacker soon came back again. His victim had crawled inside the front door of an apartment house at 82-62 Austin St. He found her sprawled on the floor and stabbed her still again. This time he killed her."

"It was not until 3:50 that morning -- March 13, 1964 -- that a neighbor of the victim called police. Officers arrived two minutes later and found the body. They identified the victim as Catherine Genovese, 28, who had been returning from her job as manager of a bar in Hollis. Neighbors knew her not as Catherine but as Kitty."
http://www.newsday.com/community/guide/lihistory/ny-history-hs818a,0,7944135.story


"The crime was not as gruesome as some others, since many more were just as violent, and still more that easily surpassed it. The victim was an ordinary working girl, not at all wealthy and not a member of any elite class. Her name was Catherine Genovese, the 28-year-old daughter of Italian-American parents. But to millions of people who read her story when it first appeared in New York City’s press, she would forever be remembered as “Kitty” Genovese. What happened to her, what happened to all of society on that dreadful night in the spring of 1964, would reverberate across the country and generate a national soul-searching that is reserved for only the most catastrophic of events."
http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/kitty_genovese/



Everyone knew a crime was being committed, yet they chose to ignore the woman's screams. Too busy watching soap operas I guess.
Like Kitty Genovese' murderer, Dick and George continue to thrust knives into the body of American Democracy unabated. Will it take a trip to The Hague to restore our good name with the rest of humanity?
The 20% who remain as the Bush/Cheney cartel's enablers and their handmaidens in the corporate media must be taken to task. A public horse whipping is in order here. Hell, we're not the ones who made torture legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. We will never overcome...
...the shame of this period in our history. There are too many bodies; too much blood, and not one good reason for any of it. I blame the media for most, if not all, of our ills. I have come to realize that the most critical "estate" in a republic is its Fourth Estate. The media has destroyed this nation -- and they're damn proud of it.

E.L. Doctorow wrote a short piece in the East Hampton (NY) Star in Sept 2004 that I return to often. It is primarily about Bush as an "unfeeling" individual, but Doctorow notes the millions of people around the world who protested against the war -- a "spontaneous aroused oversoul of alarm and protest that transcended national borders..." It was a cry against America turning its back on the future, Doctorow says, and I agree with him. The crime against humanity here is that the media muted that cry.

Although I doubt it, we might one day restore our standing -- but never our good name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I was in the streets in NYC
Edited on Fri May-16-08 12:19 PM by The Wizard
March, 03. There were at least a half a million protesting and the media ignored it. Pox (deliberate typo) News reported the number at 10,000.
We should have surrounded the media outlets and not let anyone in or out. That would have gotten their attention. The corporate propaganda that poses as an independent free press is no better than TAAS, Pravda and Izvestia in the old Soviet Union. At least the Soviet citizens knew it was propaganda and for the most part either ignored it or took it with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. i remember that i was five years old then...
- all these years later it still hurts...





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptJasHook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. Excellent....
This piece has deep resonance.

Does anyone know what legal recourse we, as citizens have? I have marched, petitioned, written my XXXXXX, campaigned, etc. I see a lot of things slowly changing, but the dreadnaught in Washington seems unbeatable, unflappable, unstoppable.

Any real path to velvet revolution? Because I have been in the military, and I know their power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. To CaptJasHook
I wish I could say that the "legal recourse" we have is a fair election -- but then you'd just tell me to remove my head from -- um, the sand. Before the last election, Greg Palast maintained if we showed up in such huge numbers it would be impossible for them to steal it, we would win. We showed up, and we won. The fact that those we elected caved to the entrenched power before their initial tour of the Hill was completed is another matter. We need to show up in even larger numbers this time, but refuse to loosen our grip on their collective balls until they realize they work for us and not the lobbyists...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptJasHook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. I hope you are right.
No, I don't think your head is buried in the sand... far from it. You words speak otherwise.

It is only my paranoia (Generation X, here) and general distrust in the political system that makes me pine for a more fundamental, legally documented process for citizens without money to have a direct effect on the federal government without having to wait every two or four years.

I'm the one with my hope up my....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. K&R!
Another well-researched, thought provoking essay. You never disappoint, Ms. Samples. Good to hear from you again. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thanks, yellerpup
But -- if you don't call me Sheila, I'm going to call you Yellow Puppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Okey-doke.
From an ex-pat Okie in NY. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. great op! Now that we have a presumptive nominee, let's
hope we can all get back to the main issues. I've have that Cohen song running through my head for a long time now. It so perfectly describes what has been happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheila Samples Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. New American Century Site is Down...
I've just been informed that PNAC is down and the two 1998 letters to Clinton and Gingrich, as well as the Memo sent out four days before the inauguration are no longer available.

Did ya'll crash that site -- or does Kristol not want us peeking into the past -- to see the future?

I have copies of the letters if you want them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. Excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. k and r...
- great thread / thank you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. GREAT article, S.S. and thankx for posting.
I'd like to add a few things about Dick Cheney. When he first ascended to power, I was mystefied by him (and also Bush).

Over time, there were things that didn't add up. Like the build-up to the Iraq war. The lies, the chicanery, the manipulation of facts to fit the policy.
Above all, the INCOMPETENCE. The sheer, breathtaking stupidity. We started asking ourselves, "are they really evil geniuses?" just pretending to be complete morons, whereas in reality they are geniuses, just to throw us off guard.

Just pretending to be stupid.
This issue used to drive me bonkers. Seriously: it was a threat to my peace of mind I just could not reconcile how two seemingly fools could be so successful, get everything they wanted, and no one stood in their way.
I HAD To find out. Started obsessively collecing facts, surfed into the DU on a wave of pure rage. After weeks of digging into Dick Cheney's past, I found out the following:

VERDICT
The facts are in. Dick Cheney is an incompetent fool. His past is littered with bad decisions, stupid mistakes, and lots of cover ups. He was SO bad, in fact, that he was called "The Curse of Cheney" because he ruined other peoples' careers with his bad policies.

So how come he's been so successful?
Answer = he was just used as a "front man" for behind-the-scenes plans. He was rewarded handsomely for his thuggery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
27. bookmark for morning n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. I only regret having missed this thread, kicked too late to recommend.
This is an excellent post and I totally agree, thanks for the thread, Sheila Samples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC