By Dean Baker - June 12, 2008, 12:47PM
Like many progressives I was disappointed to hear the line-up for Obama's economic team going into the general election. The lead figure will be Jason Furman, who was the director of the Hamilton Project at Brookings. This project is the brainchild of Robert Rubin the leading light of the Wall Street Democrats. While my friends and fellow progressive economists, Jared Bernstein and Jamie Galbraith are on the team (I have also been contacted), it is clear who has the leading role.
<snip>
They have trumpeted the Social Security "crisis" for more than a quarter century, convincing the bulk of the public that the program is on the edge of bankruptcy. While proponents of the crisis view are all over the news, editorial pages, and pundit shows, the basic facts about the program's finances are almost never mentioned.
<snip>
Of course this dichotomy is absurd. NAFTA and the other trade deals are about selective protectionism. They are designed to put manufacturing workers, who tend to be less educated and less highly-paid, into direct competition with low-paid workers in the developing world, while leaving our most highly educated and highly paid workers (e.g. doctors, lawyers, and economists) largely protected. These deals also increase patent and copyright protection, two hugely distortionary forms of protection.
<snip>
The reality is that if Obama had picked a progressive economist (a.k.a. a Neanderthal protectionist), who had not been initiated into the Wall Street club, he would have gotten beaten up so badly by the media that he would want Reverend Wright to come back for more press events.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/12/why_obama_should_have_picked_m/The whole thing is worth a read.