Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing, Lockheed May Lose as Obama, McCain Reject Big Weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:37 AM
Original message
Boeing, Lockheed May Lose as Obama, McCain Reject Big Weapons
Bloomberg News: Boeing, Lockheed May Lose as Obama, McCain Reject Big Weapons
By Ken Fireman and Gopal Ratnam

June 30 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. warned its clients last month that Barack Obama would be "a negative for defense stocks" if he became president, because he will cut weapons programs that generate the companies' biggest profits. Boeing Co., Lockheed Martin Corp. and other military contractors may not fare any better under John McCain.

While the two presidential candidates are hammering each other over their differences on Iraq, they share a skepticism over big Pentagon programs such as Lockheed Martin's F-22 fighter and the Army's $159 billion Future Combat Systems, a modernization plan jointly managed by Boeing and SAIC Inc. "When you get beyond the issue of the war in Iraq, Senator McCain and Senator Obama sound remarkably similar on many defense issues," says Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Virginia.

Both have signaled they will increase overall defense spending. Still, they say the military should invest in technologies best-suited to fighting the unconventional wars of the post-Sept. 11 world -- and rethink those designed for the Cold War. Thompson says that will likely lead them to favor building more cargo and tanker planes and developing the Littoral Combat Ship, a new Navy vessel designed for coastal operations....

***

Both McCain and Obama say they will order a comprehensive review of weapons spending early in their presidency....

***

Whitten Peters, an Obama military adviser, says it's wrong to view his candidate as a reflexive Pentagon budget-cutter. He disputes the May 13 Goldman Sachs analysis that an Obama presidency would be harmful to the defense industry. "He has said he'd spend on defense what needs to be spent, recognizing overall constraints on the budget," Peters says. Obama isn't going to take money from the military budget to pay for domestic programs, he says....

***

The industry isn't tilting either way, according to one measure: campaign contributions. Its total donations to the two candidates are virtually equal....

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adXiGrYSU5PA&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC