Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FBI mishandling of anthrax case leaves many questions unanswered

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 02:35 AM
Original message
FBI mishandling of anthrax case leaves many questions unanswered
Edited on Fri Aug-15-08 02:36 AM by mhatrw
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/375049_thomasson15.html

FBI mishandling of anthrax case leaves many questions unanswered

DAN K. THOMASSON
SYNDICATED COLUMNIST

WASHINGTON - The FBI's mishandling of the anthrax case and its rush to claim it solved not only have made it doubtful the truth of the matter ever will come out, but it has turned this nightmare into a conspiracy freak's dream. It is safe to predict that every nut case who believes in the New World Order already is preparing his contention that Bruce Ivins, the microbiologist tagged as the "real" culprit, a) didn't act alone, b) was the fall guy for a plot devised by an official government either foreign or domestic, c) actually was President Bush's plot to get rid of the then Senate Democratic Leader, Thomas Daschle, who was one of those sent the lethal bacteria, or d) all of the above.

It is not difficult to imagine a whole new multigazillion dollar cottage industry of theories in print, TV and movies will pop up to rival that of the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Before it is over, one would not be surprised to find that this hideous biological attack on America could be directly linked not only to Kennedy's death but also to that of Abraham Lincoln. A more prudent approach would have spared us much of this speculation. But the FBI is nothing if not imprudent, as has been demonstrated time and again.

...

So the day they were to arrest him, he swallowed enough pills to kill himself and left the world to wonder was he truly the madman of the Army's bio-defense lab as the FBI contends? A number of his fellow scientists argue convincingly otherwise, pointing to holes in the technology used by the bureau. Without the public examination of the evidence in court and the opportunity for him to defend against the allegations, how can anyone say for certain? For the time being, at least, and perhaps forever, the answer unfortunately may be left up to those for whom conspiracy is a religion.



Yes, it's the conspiracy theorists' fault that the FBI has no case against Ivins! Damn those damn conspiracy theorists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL! 57 Bush Justice Department scandals later
if your default is to believe the JD, you're an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC