"First Toxic Bank"; BBC Business Editor on the bailout

[muriel_volestrangler]

Investors are probably right to conclude that one great source of stress will be lifted from the banking system, as and when Paulson sucks their toxic subprime loans, unsellable asset-backed securities, and radioactive collateralised debt obligations into a vast, lead-lined box financed by US taxpayers.
...
That said, the devil will be in the detail of the mechanics of the rescue. What we don't yet know, for example, is whether Paulson's First Toxic Bank - as I shall christen his vehicle for buying the stinky housing loans - will pay the written-down price for the debt, the market price (which after Lehmans collapse is lower than the written-down price) or a discount to the market price.
...
But if he bails banks out at the price of this stuff in their books or above, well that would be an acknowledgement that an entire generation of banking executives had behaved wholly irresponsibly in their lending practices for years.

Arguably, they should all be sacked and thrown on to the mercy of a jobs market made all the less kind by their own recklessness.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2008/09/true_cost_of_the_rescue.html

[dkf]

1. The devil is in the details as they say.

[Demeter]

2. Mind If I Crosspost to Weekend Economist?

[Karenina]

3. First Toxic Bank...

kinda has a ring to it, eh?