Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dealing With the Financial Crisis: An Immodest Proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:53 PM
Original message
Dealing With the Financial Crisis: An Immodest Proposal
Or perhaps that should be "A Supramodest" proposal. In that what I'm suggesting is not small in any way, except insofar as it doesn't involve saving the bloated assets of the greedheads whose bacchanalian raid on the economy got us here.

My proposal is based on the following non-negotiable assumptions:

1. We do need a financial and credit infrastructure. Devolving back to a gold-based currency and/or a cash/barter basis economy is not a viable solution. There are billions of dollars in assets, including thousands of ordinary workers doing ordinary jobs, tied up in the existing troubled system. It will, in the long run, be cheaper to salvage those assets and base the new system on the existing system than it will be to let the current system fail altogether and attempt to re-invent it from the ground up.

2. John McCain is one hundred percent correct when he states (but ONLY when he states this) that the fundamental engine of our economy is our workers (read: LABOR) and that our workers are the world's most productive. In fact, I would say that socialistic pronouncement by the GOP candidate for President is correct, but incomplete. Capital, the inventory of resources such as cash and equipment and raw materials and operating space, etc., that enable the economy to function, is also a fundamental engine, and we need both. But the sheer size of the workforce and the families supported by American workers is the bulk of our GDP and thus, merits primary consideration in devising a solution to the current crisis.

Are we clear on those? Good. That said, here's the plan:

A. A massive infusion of cash into the FDIC's deposit insurance fund to protect public confidence in the safety of their checking accounts, savings accounts, CDs, etc., up to an increased amount of $250,000 per account. This will also keep our neighborhood banks solvent, at least to the extent of their deposits. Neighborhood banks will be at the nub of the crisis for many of us-- we need to know that the money we have in there will be available when we write our next mortgage check or rent check.

B. A rolling "bank holiday" that will close down every financial institution in the country for 24-72 hours (though not all at once) while their books are audited by agents of the new "Financial Institution Supervisory Agency (FISA-- how do you like that?) Their assets and status will be confirmed as "sound" (in which case they reopen and do business as usual, no change,) "threatened," (in which case they are placed under the direct supervision of FISA monitors who authorize remedies and require changes until the institution qualifies as "sound") or "unsound" (in which case their assets devolve to FISA which handles them based on #C, below.)

C. Unsound financial institutions have their remaining assets distributed FIRST to holders in these categories in this order: small depositors (under $250K,) institutional pension funds, government deposits, common stock holders, preferred stock holders, bond holders, and finally large depositors and everyone else. Their debts and liabilities devolve to FISA which holds them as taxpayer equity, publicly-owned property (nationalized) and either resecures them and manages them, or realizes them at the loss. Ultimately, they can be re-sold to private parties if a profit can be made.

D. A new code of financial regulations is developed that mandates accountability, transparency, federal oversight, and separation of transaction types to preclude conflicts of interest for all financial institutions.

E. The minimum wage rises on a graduated basis and becomes indexed to a new regionalized cost-of-living rate that is calculated based on real expenses for a family of three with one wage earner (that is, food, energy, etc., are included in the rate.) The existence of "exempt" employees is phased out and wage and hour rules apply to everyone and are rigidly enforced. Benefits are mandated to ALL workers on a pro-rata basis. No more exploiting white collar and pink collar grunts for fifty-hour weeks at base pay, or hiring legions of part-timers with no benefits. Companies will have to actually hire enough real workers to actually do the work, creating millions of new jobs.

F. A new category of business is created: "Infrastructure business." The category includes energy, health care, transportation, and other key functions in key sectors and qualifying companies will receive preferential subsidies, government contracts, and capital investment in return for taxpayer (nationalized) equity.

G. Incentives to the "infrastructure business" sector will be used to create new jobs, not unlike the old New Deal programs, targeted to areas and sectors hardest-hit by unemployment.

H. Bankruptcy laws and rules are restored to their 1979 status.

As you will notice, there is no place in this plan for the funding of current CEO and board member and executive compensation packages, buyout agreements, stock option or equity redemptions, etc.

I think this will bail out the economy nicely. It certainly needs lots of tinkering and fine-tuning by economists and experts, but the outline should remain substantially the same.

I'm off to tilt at some windmills and scream into a howling gale now.

cynically,
Bright

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just in time, I was looking for a solution that didn't include Wall Street!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. This desperately needs to be an LTTE or op-ed for a major national publication
Astute as always, Bright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObamaMagnets Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll join you in the screaming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Definitely on the right track.
Our currency will end up being based on our HOMES, and it's 40% of our economy. We need to save them and stabilize them, and most can be. We need another New Deal kind of Home Owners Loan Corp. to redo mortgages down to just over the cost of money, and NOT sliced up in repackaging. They must remain capable of modifications individually, should the need arise.

We're in this trouble because mortgages were "cut up" so that no changes could ever be made. It's literally impossible under the law we have, that's what is NOT being said! That's what the "homeowner relief" in this bailout did NOT address. Nothing could be done for the homeowner in that bill, it can't be, without refinancing completely.

Our banks painted everyone into an impossible corner with that "slicing up" of mortgages, and the homeowner never even knew about it - had zero part in it. Life isn't perfect, never will be!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelworker In OH Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The banks
Tried that with my Aunt in Texas. She knew what she could afford walking in to get the loan, and they tried selling her a loan for 3x the amount, as a "pay interest only" in bankers terms that most of us can't understand. Luckly she did her homework beforehand and didn't fall for it.

Thats the real reason for the meltdown, the greedy banks and finance companies sold millions of people loans they couldn't afford based on an intrest and credit system that is highly flawed. Sucker you into taking out a loan where you pay interest only for 20-30 years, and at the end you still have the full or close to full value of your home to pay....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelworker In OH Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. *Clapping*
Start spreading this around if you can, throw it out to some senate and house reps. Its a great start, just need some fine tuning in the way it all works together. Very good ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lutherj Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd vote for that. The one thing I'd add is credit card and lendor reform.
There's a reason they called it usury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Very reasonable! Send it to the dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. On principle alone the CEO's deserve minimum wage.
Perhaps we could recalculate it back to their teens and subtract the remainder from their current holdings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. How about a currency that is based on Labor-The Hour Money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC