Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Adoring Pundits Missed the Collapse of John McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 11:17 AM
Original message
Why Adoring Pundits Missed the Collapse of John McCain
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/18153

Why Adoring Pundits Missed the Collapse of John McCain
by Brent Budowsky | October 23, 2008



When John McCain famously said that the press was part of his political base, he was right, but also setting his own trap. The press has been in love with John McCain for years and McCain has benefited from the adoration and friendly bias of the press for a career.

The problem is, what McCain had was a great act -- in fact, many great acts. He was the Reagan-style Republican, then the Republican maverick, then the Republican who thought about leaving the Republican Party and turning a Republican Senate to Democrats, then the Republican who thought about running with Kerry, then the Republican who became the Bush acolyte and buddy when Bush was up, then the Republican who pretends he never supported Bush, between acts as the champion against negative campaigning and then the leading negative campaigner and smear artist in presidential campaign history.

My colleague at The Hill, A.B. Stoddard, said on MSNBC that McCain was unlucky. No, A.B., it was not bad luck that did McCain in, it was miserable judgment, bad decisions, bad policies, an angry demeanor. It was not bad luck that led McCain to say the economy was strong and sound while it collapsed; it was that McCain was on another planet than most Americans. It was not bad luck that led McCain to pick Palin, it was bad, miserable, small-minded judgment to pick a right-wing know-nothing, which I and others immediately wrote would be a total disaster. It was not bad luck that led McCain to be confused about economic policy, to have a ridiculous airlift into urgent negotiations over the bailout that made him look like the Keystone Cops.

McCain has gotten a free ride from an adoring press for years, with one act after another, one new McCain after another, one shape-shifting image after another, each one tailored to the public opinion of its time, each one adored and excused and admired by a worshipful press that McCain said, for years, correctly, was part of his political base.

Picking Sarah Palin was a farce destined to fail, a farce by a McCain who did not know or vet the person he chose, a farce that put a shallow, vindictive and often ignorant person who has no business being a heartbeat away from the presidency in precisely that position. It wasn't bad luck, it was a small-minded decision done in the most incompetent manner with the most predictable result.

snip//

The problem with McCain is not that he was unlucky, it was that he was insincere. In the white-hot glare of presidential politics, his various acts melted like butter on a hot stove in a collapsing economy while John McCain has nothing to say except smears, lies and personal attacks against his opponent.

The nation wants Franklin Roosevelt, and McCain gives them Joe McCarthy. It is not a matter of luck; it is a failure of temperament and presidential character and judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. John McCain has no principles. He doesn't
believe in anything other than himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norepubsin08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not even sure he believes in himself anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. SIS,,, You did it again,, Bingo!!! you hit the nail on the head again
Good read,, good job,,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. "The nation wants Franklin Roosevelt, and McCain gives them Joe McCarthy." -- that's powerful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. On Rachel's show last night, she was saying that this is why
Senators are so rarely elected President; because in their long careers they vote in different ways.

Couldn't help but think of Senator Wellstone, who NEVER changed his position and I'm sure never would have; he always voted his conscience, and his conscience was progressive, caring, and truly good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not just John McCain ... the press has been having a love affair with Republics since Reagan.
Personally, I am sick of it. The truth really does matter.

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC