Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the numbers don't match (MN recount)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 12:20 AM
Original message
Why the numbers don't match (MN recount)
Last update: December 5, 2008 - 9:35 PM

... The Star Tribune is reporting the results as it has throughout the recount. Each of Minnesota's 4,130 precincts is included. New recounted numbers are used for those precincts that have reported them -- now 4,129 precincts. For precincts that have not yet reported -- now just one Minneapolis precinct where ballots are missing -- the newspaper includes the tally for the precinct that was reported to the state Canvassing Board last month, before the recount began.

The Secretary of State's website, also in keeping with its practice throughout the recount, is reporting results only from the precincts that have filed their new numbers. It does not include the one Minneapolis precinct still outstanding ...

The Star Tribune shows Coleman with a lead of 192, while the Secretary of State gives Coleman a 687-vote lead. The difference is 495 -- Franken's net votes from the precinct in question.

The Franken campaign says that its tally shows Franken ahead by four votes ... The campaign projects results from more than 6,000 ballots that have been challenged by the two campaigns. Those ballots do not figure in either the newspaper's or the Secretary's count. The Franken campaign ... assumes that the official's ruling will be upheld in every case when the state Canvassing Board resolves the challenges.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/35638064.html?elr=KArks8c7PaP3E77K_3c::D3aDhUec7PaP3E77K_0c::D3aDhUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm glad I am not the only one confused how hard is it for the SOS to update his website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am confused as to who is leading..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think that is impossible to say until the missing ballots
Edited on Sat Dec-06-08 12:53 AM by hlthe2b
are either found or a decision made to include the original count from those ballots in Minneapolis. Franken makes that assumption and in addition, chooses a conservative interpretation of what will happen on the 6000 challenged ballots--essentially that the original opinion of the reviewing judges will be upheld and he increases both his own and COleman's counts by those numbers. After doing, that gives Franken a 4 point lead according to his campaign.... While that could be wiped out if the missing ballot issue is not resolved, or there are major changes based on the challenged ballots, or (the final question mark) the absentee ballots that were excluded in error are allowed to be reexamined and counted.... One would think these scenarios would all be resolved in a way that would likely favor Franken, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think you missed the point... The SOS website is continuously
updated... You might want to read the article in full on the website... It really does do a good job of explaining the differences between the SOS, newspaper, and Franken campaigns methods... and why you would expect them to differ based on what information they are taking into account at this stage of the game and conversely, what data they are knowingly excluding until a later date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC