Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Violation of privacy? Court says no, it's just good citizenship.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 10:16 AM
Original message
Violation of privacy? Court says no, it's just good citizenship.
Dentist called cops when patient asked for pain-killers
Violation of privacy?
Court says no, it's just good citizenship.

A dentist did not violate California’s medical privacy statute by reporting to the San Francisco Police Department that one of its officers, a patient of the dentist, might have a problem with prescription drugs, the First District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday.

Div. Four, in an opinion by Presiding Justice Laurence Kay, affirmed San Francisco Superior Court Judge Thomas J. Mellon’s ruling in favor of the dentist, Jeffrey J. Bertani. The panel agreed that the disclosure was “specifically authorized by law” and was thus not prohibited by the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act.

Officer Ricky Shaddox, a member of the department since 1989, was seen by Bertani in April 1998. When the dentist could not find any source for the pain Shaddox was claiming, he suggested that the officer simply have his teeth cleaned.

Bertani later testified that Shaddox asked for Vicodin, which Bertani would not prescribe. The officer, Bertani told Mellon at the bench trial on the officer’s lawsuit, “gave this icy glare as if he wanted to...beat me up.”

http://www.unknownnews.net/0731-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ex_jew Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why is this a medical privacy issue ?
The cop went to the doc to score some pills. There WAS no medical problem. If there had been, it would have changed the situation, but there wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pookiesdame Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Why is this a medical privacy issue ?"
It's a privacy issue for those of us who don't want our health care providers doing double duty as narks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, I'm sorry
If the cop was abusing Vicodin (a brand name for hydrocodone, a highly addictive Class 3 controlled substance), then he badly needed help. Medical and dental practitioners are one of the primary ways in which abuse of prescription controlled drugs is uncovered, and they have the right to report such concerns when they have them.

Let me ask you, do you feel reassured by the thought that members of the law enforcement community might be impaired by drugs while they're one duty? Those same doctors and dentists sometimes become addicted themselves, and their own patients have to "nark" on them sometimes. Do you want your dentist giving you an injection in the mouth when he's high on Vicodin? It happens more often than you think.

I know this from first hand experience: I was a controlled drug investigator for the State of Missouri for several years. And we weren't there to "nark" on people on the street; we were enforcing laws that helped make sure that medical professionals were accountable for the controlled drugs they purchased for dispensing, and which also helped to make sure that such drugs ended up only in the hands of people with a legitimate medical need for them.

Dirk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC