Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Bernie Sanders: As Wall Street collapses, so does Milton Friedman’s legacy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:00 PM
Original message
Sen. Bernie Sanders: As Wall Street collapses, so does Milton Friedman’s legacy.
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:01 PM by babylonsister
http://inthesetimes.com/article/4193/the_failed_prophet

The Failed Prophet
As Wall Street collapses, so does Milton Friedman’s legacy.
By Sen. Bernie Sanders


On Dec. 2, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) delivered a speech entitled ‘Milton Friedman’s Legacies: On the U.S. Economic Crisis in response to the University of Chicago creating the Milton Friedman Institute for Research in Economics. In case you can’t guess where he stands on the issue, that’s an anti-MFI button on his lapel.



If I went before a town hall meeting in Vermont and asked if people thought it would be a good idea to abolish Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, people would think I was crazy.

The late Milton Friedman was a provocative teacher at my alma mater, the University of Chicago. He got his students involved with their studies. He was a gifted writer and communicator. And he received a Nobel Prize for his contributions to economics.

But Friedman was more than an academic. He was an advocate for, and popularizer of, a radical right-wing economic ideology.

In today’s political and social reality, the University of Chicago’s establishment of a $200 million Milton Friedman Institute (in the building that has long housed the renowned Chicago Theological Seminary) will not be perceived as simply a sign of appreciation for a prominent former faculty member. Instead, by founding such an institution, the university signals that it is aligning itself with a reactionary political program supported by the wealthiest, greediest and most powerful people and institutions in this country. Friedman’s ideology caused enormous damage to the American middle class and to working families here and around the world. It is not an ideology that a great institution like the University of Chicago should be seeking to advance.

Those who defend the Milton Friedman Institute will assure us that it will encourage a free and open exchange of ideas. That may very well be true. But if the goal of the institute is simply to do non-ideological research, there are a lot of names that one could come up with other than that of the most polemical and ideological economist of his time.

snip//

In the Bush era—a period in which some of Friedman’s greatest admirers managed the U.S. economy—the top 400 families in this country saw their wealth increase by $670 billion.

Yet we have children in this country who have no healthcare, children who are undernourished and children who sleep out on the streets. From an economic perspective, from a moral perspective and from a philosophical perspective, the ideology of Milton Friedman is dead wrong. And the University of Chicago is making a serious mistake in establishing a new platform for its failed ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow -- Bernie Sanders went to my dad's alma mater (U of Chicago)
When I was a kid, I used to be proud of where he went
to school but as I've matured and realized how much
economic/political B.S. came out of that institution,
I've held it in lower esteem. It's refreshing to hear
about someone I ADMIRE being a University of Chicago
graduate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. There's plenty of admirable, as well as not-so-admirable, alums of the U. of C.
Just look at the Wikipedia entry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_University_of_Chicago_people

Studs Terkel
Thomas Frank
Seymour Hersh
among others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wish we had 50 more Bernie's in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. 59 more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whatever Else Friedman Believed,
he advocated a small constant increase in the money supply of 3-4%.

Right now, that's looking like it would have been a pretty good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great article.
Anybody who's read Naomi Klein's The Shock Doctrine will know how much of a repulsive figure Friedman is. Keep on fighting Bernie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Is tom friedman his son? If so, they are cut out of the same crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. The more i read about Republicans, the more they sound like a cult rather than a political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I've thought that for years too

Welcome to DU
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thanks!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. If only that were true...
but Obama et al are determined to keep theft-by-profit a mainstay of the 'economy'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Simple-minded dogmas never do work well in the real world.
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 08:24 AM by bemildred
And "Free Market Capitalism" is a simple-minded dogma. It envisions the "free market" as a kind of feedback mechanism that keep the economy in adjustment "like magic". But it they really bothered to learn about feedback mechanisms, they would know that what happens depends on the kind (negative or positive) and the measure of the feedback generated by a given displacement, and they would consider that the continuing changes in the technical and resource environments of the "free market" are very disruptive. They would even realize that what being "in adjustment" means is constantly changing, and hence the "free market" would have to be hitting a rapidly moving target to work it's "magic". And then they would eventually realize that the whole theory is a simple-minded dogma that has little to do with how things work in the "real world". All these bubbles, for example, are classic indications of positive feedback mechanisms at work in market pricing. One would have to apply negative feedback (taxes for example, or price controls) to get a stable pricing effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. your right
Its like open loop, high gain system. No feedback (especially negative) - wildly unstable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. the problem...
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 02:54 PM by Locrian
is not that friedman is wrong about the market being good for all. He's defintly wrong about that. The free market is NOT the best way to regulate for the "good of all".

But the issue is that they DONT CARE. They dont WANT to have it good for all. I used to think they honestly cared and wanted to believe they are helping everyone. Some misguided suckers do - they have been conned that the "free market" is the way the little guy gets ahead. That its "pick yourself up and get to work" and the free market is god.

But the real rich KNOW IT IS A FUCKING LIE. And they DONT CARE. They want to push it over from wink wink capitalism to feudalism. Where they finally own EVERYTHING.

Because the one thing they can never have is ENOUGH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well that's true, first comes what you want, and then comes the rationalization for it.
And in that context, any excuse will do, and the "free market" lie has served them well all these years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. if we had an educated electorate, Bernie would be president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC