Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shelved - did Kremlin make my Stalin book disappear?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:41 PM
Original message
Shelved - did Kremlin make my Stalin book disappear?
Shelved - did Kremlin make my Stalin book disappear?

Orlando Figes
The Guardian, Wednesday 4 March 2009


Yesterday the Russian publishing house Atticus cancelled the publication of an acclaimed book by the Russian scholar Orlando Figes about life under Stalin. The publisher said it was dropping the book for economic reasons, but the historian believes that the decision was the product of political pressure and reflects a desire by the Kremlin to rehabilitate Stalin.

The history in my book, The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin's Russia, is inconvenient to the current regime in Russia.

It draws on several hundred family archives and thousands of interviews with survivors of the Stalinist regime which I conducted with Memorial, a human rights and historical research centre which has been nominated for the Nobel peace prize.

On 4 December a group of masked men from the investigative committee of the Russian general prosecutor's office forced their way into the St Petersburg offices of Memorial. After a search the men confiscated hard drives containing the entire archive of Memorial in St Petersburg: databases with biographical information on victims of repression; details about burial sites in the St Petersburg area; family archives; sound recordings and transcripts of interviews.

All the materials I collected with Memorial in St Petersburg (about one third of the sources used in The Whisperers) were also confiscated. The raid was part of a broader ideological struggle over the control of history publications and teaching in Russia that may have influenced the decision of Atticus to cancel my contract.

The Kremlin has been actively for the rehabilitation of Stalin. Its aim is not to deny Stalin's crimes but to emphasise his achievements as the builder of the country's "glorious Soviet past". It wants Russians to take pride in their Soviet past and not to be burdened with a paralysing sense of guilt about the repressions of the Stalin period.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/04/orlando-figes-stalin-publisher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the irony of it all is
Stalin was a Georgian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Putin has actively pushed Russian pride and nationalism
Not judging him either way.

(snip)
At a conference in June 2007, Vladimir Putin called on Russia's schoolteachers to portray the Stalin period in a more positive light. It was Stalin who made Soviet Union great, who won the war against Hitler, and his "mistakes" were no worse than the crimes of western states, he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Memorial seizure has been a big topic on SEELangs.
I can only imagine it's been discussed thoroughly on other quasi-academic lists and boards.

I'm surprised anybody tried to get Figes' book published in Russian. It should be--apart from a brief outburst of info in the early '90s the entire matter's been of no great interest to many Russians.

In fact, there's probably been more effort into showing that Stalin was set up by the West (either in 1938-9 or during the war itself), that the US and the West didn't help Russia at all (lend-lease is overlooked), that Stalin was set up by the Jews or undermined by the non-Russian or non-Slavic minorities, than there is in actually trying to understand what happened.

Rather like ignoring the effect Khrushchev's corn fetish had on Soviet agriculture, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC