Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Privately, Barack Obama strongly backs public option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:22 AM
Original message
Privately, Barack Obama strongly backs public option
Source: Chicago Tribune


Health care reform: Privately, Barack Obama strongly backs public option
White House discreetly labors to weave coalition on health care

By Noam N. Levey and Janet Hook Tribune Newspapers

October 4, 2009

WASHINGTON - -- Despite months of seeming ambivalence about creating a government health insurance plan, the Obama White House has launched an intensifying behind-the-scenes campaign to get divided Senate Democrats to take up some version of the idea in the weeks just ahead.

President Barack Obama has long advocated a so-called public option, while at the same time repeatedly expressing openness to other ways to offer consumers a potentially more affordable alternative to health plans sold by private insurers.

But now, senior administration officials are holding private meetings almost daily at the Capitol with senior Democratic staff to discuss ways to include a version of the public plan in the health care bill that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., plans to bring to the Senate floor later this month, according to senior Democratic congressional aides.

Among those regularly in the meetings are Obama's top health care adviser, Nancy-Ann DeParle, aides to Reid, and Senate finance and health committee staff, both of which developed health care bills.

Read more: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-tc-nw-healthcare-obama-1003-oct04,0,1969667.story?page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. He doesn't mean squat what he backs privately.
He needs to get off his ass and lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. What matters is getting it through Congress. A public campaign without the numbers to pass it
through Congress is useless. Ben Nelson, Even Byah & Joe Lieberman are not the same as Bernie Sanders, Al Franken and Barbara Boxer. We have a big tent full of cats bolting all over the place.

The twisting arms time is coming up. It hasn't passed. What matters is what ends up on his desk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. And that may take back-door, quiet pressure
allowing some of those pseudo-Dems to save face while doing the right thing. Frankly, if that gets it done, I don't care. I would think if anyone understands how it is done, it's Rahm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. These are the rationalizations that have kept the status quo going for centuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Truly. "Yes he might" should have been the slogan
what he does or doesn't believe in is known only to him, which is not the way to rally the troops behind your ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. You obviously don't know anything
about it but it doesn't stop you from barking orders on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gee isn't that great
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Folks the real game starts after Tuesday when the final proposal is out of committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't really care what he privately backs. All that matters is whats gets passed.
None of the mandated blood money to insurance companies or you go to jail shit. Lay off the caps on malpractice awards - just need a panel to make sure claims have merit, not caps. No to the cross state sell of insurance - we saw how that works with credit cards. Public option as an option for EVERYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. talk is cheap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Mr. President, get off your ass and take the lead publically on this issue.
Dry powder is NO substitute for HEALTHCARE FOR ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. 25 to 35 Dem reps...
...in purple districts know that their potential survival in a mid-term election depend on distancing themselves from the White House.

The moment Obama 'gets off his ass and takes the lead publicly on this issue', half of them bolt the other way, 'defying the White House' thereby ensuring their re-election.

How does that help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Before I'd believe that he "strongly backs public option".......
I'd have to see some evidence to that effect.

Even if he does, he can't compete with the insurance industry lobbyists; the administration isn't going to provide funding for Senators'/Congressmen's re-election campaigns.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Then Make it So...
then we'll decide what we think of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. So what is this saying?
At best: Calculations on whether saying something in public is risky to his image are more important than telling the truth, or effecting a real reform. Perhaps he's saving the "political capital" for more important things, like lining up donors for 2012.

At less-than-best: Assumes liberals will be willing patsies for a bullshit excuse along the lines of, "He would if he could but he can't so he won't." At least he's not Bush!

Strong support for a public plan is there, among the people. Why doesn't he work to mobilize that, instead of shutting it down and playing the same backroom politics that always serve to maintain the status quo?

Oh, I forget, it will be different this time! He's a chess player!

No risk, no gain.

More importantly: no movement from below = nothing happens.

A rally for a public plan could get a million people to DC. But the left has decided to cede the ground to a comparatively small fraction of teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gee... if only he were in some sort of powerful position...where he could do something...
Wouldn't that be nice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. He also privately made a deal with the pharmaceutical industry. So much for transparency!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. And privately, Dick Cheney might support same sex marriage
If you read up on the Cheneys you'll see that they actually have a much more progressive PRIVATE attitude toward the issues, undoubtedly because of their daughter. But since that doesn't translate itself into public action, what difference does it make outside of their own family?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. Amazing that blind Obama supporters rationalize this apolitical behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC