Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Extra: The Great WMD Hunt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 11:30 AM
Original message
Extra: The Great WMD Hunt
The media knew they were there--but where are they?

*snip*

So with much of southern Iraq in the hands of coalition forces by the weekend after the opening of hostilities, reporters naturally started asking where the weapons were: "Bush administration officials were peppered yesterday with questions about why allied forces in Iraq have not found any of the chemical or biological weapons that were President Bush's central justification for forcibly disarming Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's government," the Washington Post reported (3/23/03).

Miraculously, the answer seemed to come that Sunday night (3/23/03), when military officials told the media of a "chemical facility" found in the southern town of Najaf. "Bob, as you know, there's a lot of talk right now about a chemical cache that has been found at a chemical facility," MSNBC anchor Forrest Sawyer told White House correspondent Bob Kur. "I underscore, we do not know what the chemicals are, but it sure has gotten spread around fast."

It sure had. Over on Fox News Channel (3/23/03), the headline banners were already rolling: "HUGE CHEMICAL WEAPONS FACTORY FOUND IN SO IRAQ.... REPORTS: 30 IRAQIS SURRENDER AT CHEM WEAPONS PLANT.... COAL TROOPS HOLDING IRAQI IN CHARGE OF CHEM WEAPONS." The Jerusalem Post, whose embedded reporter helped break the story along with a Fox correspondent, announced in a front-page headline (3/24/03), "U.S. Troops Capture First Chemical Plant."

The next day (10/24/03), a Fox correspondent in Qatar quietly issued an update to the story: The "chemical weapons facility discovered by coalition forces did not appear to be an active chemical weapons facility." Further testing was required. In fact, U.S. officials had admitted that morning that the site contained no chemicals at all and had been abandoned long ago (Dow Jones wire, 3/24/03).

*snip*

http://www.fair.org/extra/0307/wmdhunt.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's because they're looking in the wrong place:
they should try looking in the U.S., instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiechiken Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. EXCELLENT review of our "liberal media's" bias ....
*cough, cough* :eyes:


(n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Headlines/Sound bites are almost always lies or misrepresentations...
while the fine print contains only semi-lies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. And guess who is in Iraq now!
Edited on Wed Aug-06-03 12:51 PM by dennis4868
David Kay.....i am convinced he was sent there by the Bushits to either plant the WMD or put together a fony case that there are WMD in Iraq. David Kay cannot be trusted (he was thrown off the UNSCUM team for unethical behavior and is a right wing hack) but I am sure he will come up with "evidence" of WMD and everyone but us will believe him, including the so called liberal media and the dems....sickening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC