Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Palin, finally a fallen star

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
heli Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:03 AM
Original message
Sarah Palin, finally a fallen star
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/15/AR2010021502856.html

Sarah Palin, finally a fallen star
By Richard Cohen
Tuesday, February 16, 2010

It's possible that Sarah Palin's best quality is that she has none at all. She exists for both her friends and enemies as a fantasy figure. For the left, she is a harbinger of the hard-right government takeover they fear is coming. And for the right, she is the leader -- all instinct and no sophistication -- that they knew would someday lead America out of its current socialist wilderness. The pity for them both is that in reality, not to mention the polls, she sorely disappoints.

I begin with the left. There, Palin has been compared to Pierre Poujade, the French populist who a half-century ago created a movement of small shopkeepers and farmers. It was tinged with anti-Semitism, anti-Americanism and was, as may now seem apparent, in the throes of idiocy. The label Poujadism suggests intolerance, a soft form of fascism... But whatever Palin and Poujade have in common, they differ in this significant matter: Poujade's movement was strictly bottom-up. He created it, and it was named for him. In Palin's case, it was the politically greedy John McCain who placed the slipper of fame on her foot -- upon which she put it in her mouth. She said the most astounding things about foreign policy, later fibbed about death panels and, in general, did a spot-on imitation of a ditz. It was a remarkable performance. Alas, for both the right and the left, Palin is not a leader. She neither founded nor leads a movement and, as far as anyone can tell, has no ideas of her own. She's a validator, satisfying her audience's narcissistic urge to be told they are correct in their thinking. They look at her and see themselves. Ah, love.

As for the right, it, too, refused to see Palin for what she was. A gaggle of neoconservatives, possibly seasick from a cruise up the Alaska coast, disembarked and were struck dumb -- literally -- by Palin's quite evident charisma. For some of them, this was a clear case of what Freud called Shiksa Madness (look it up), while for others it must have something to do with salmon. Whatever, some of them thought they had found the perfect (empty) vessel to regain control of the Republican Party and most of the United States, with the possible exception of the Blue B's -- Boulder, Berkeley and Brooklyn. The right and the left had their ideological prisms for viewing Palin. Meanwhile, to the consternation of her admirers and detractors alike, the American people were continuously assessing Palin and finally last week rendered a judgment: Not ready for prime time. An astounding 71 percent of them told pollsters they did not find Palin qualified for the presidency. It could not have been otherwise.

The lady from Alaska is a phony. She has sold out for money, quitting office so that she could cash in. She asserted her small-town bona fides, her antipathy both to the establishment and the mainstream media -- and then got herself a ghostwriter, a booking agent and a (Fox News) network contract. She is rich, famous for the metaphorical 15 minutes Andy Warhol allotted us all and, elbows swinging, is forging her way to oblivion. She was neither a threat (the left) nor an opportunity (the right), but just a fantasy -- until the American people turned the lights on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. She's low-rent, no-count, and brain-dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. the Blue B's -- Boulder, Berkeley and Brooklyn
:rofl: I've gotta remember that one!

There's gonna be a lotta Freepers with egg on their face when she walks away, laughing and counting their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starsky9 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. spot-on imitation of a ditz
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. But it's a role she plays from the heart . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. there's that famous 28% support again.
I'll bet its the same 28% who continued to give Bush positive job approval ratings right up until the end. Now the 28% think Palin qualifies as president.

Essentially, 28% of the American people are irredeemably bonkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. She should become a flautist.
Seriously. I liked her flute playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is really polite.
The truth is that some big city guys from the lower 48 ran through Wasilla waving a big fat debit card and look what came out of the woods chasing after it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber - empty vessels
Edited on Tue Feb-16-10 04:27 AM by ashling
Reading the stories today on these two I was reminded of a line from Lonesome Dove where Gus tells Woodrow that "Jake always was an empty vessel."

I looked for and couldn't find video of that line. This clip, however is about what kind of end comes to an empty vessel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E44VYR3tTE8&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Good God, I'd literally forgotten about Joe
the Plumber until now. Now, back to my regular programming.
Thanks for the clip. It was good to see Robert Urich again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Who cares what a neocon thinks of her?
They were eager to use her and now are as easy to drop her. It is as distasteful as Caligula marrying his sisters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. She did what she could with the little she had. She's not evil
she is more average American than we might wish to admit. That she is a dunce is normal, this is America. That she is greedy is normal, this is America. That she is easily led is normal, this IS America. Don't be so hard on Ms. Palin she is a normal American.

Yes I believe Ms. Palin is an AVERAGE American. Do I wish that wasn't so? Do I wish we had a much higher standard to aspire to? Of course, but wish as I may it is of no help and in the end she is .....average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
12. Please let it be so
So tired of that old drama princess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. She'll still be effective bait for contrarian idiots in the R's current Bait-and-Switch.
With the way things are small vote margins are enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. What DID Freud call "Shiksa Madness"?
I tried Googling it and could find no reference. The most popular thing to turn up is this article!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ztlore Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Shiksa = unclean, dirty - from sheketz: "abomination", "impure," "object of loathing"
Edited on Tue Feb-16-10 10:31 AM by ztlore
Maybe it means Jew-Gentile sex?
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiksa>
it may be used as a pejorative term for a non-Jewish woman
<http://www.faqs.org/faqs/judaism/FAQ/11-Miscellaneous/section-7.html>
Shiksa and Shaygetz are the Yiddish derivative of the respective feminine and masculine Hebrew words for something unclean, dirty. The appellations are customarily applied to gentiles who do things inimical to Jewish interests, such as vandalizing Jewish buildings, robbing Jewish kids of their lunch money, or becoming romantically involved with Jews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Always nice to know that nonsense is around too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heli Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Perhaps it's something like this:
http://evanstonjew.blogspot.com/2006/10/intermarriage-is-driven-by-guys.html

...Jewish men who, for one reason or another, find Jewish females less attractive than their shiksa counterparts. These men would marry a non-Jewish woman even if they were surrounded by Jewish women. These preferences are based on feelings and attitudes that are for the most part pre-conscious or unconscious, and many are not aware of any such feelings... My intuition is that a significant number of Jewish men would generally like to marry someone of their own religion but frequently would prefer a different ethnicity or background. They yearn for the shikse; they could do without her religion.

So in the interest of self flagellation I ask the question “Why do Jewish men have a greater need to distance themselves from their surroundings?” One common answer is that the proverbial Jewish mother is more suffocating and domineering than the Jewish father. Jewish men then associate Jewish women with their mothers, and run away in search of more gentle and docile females. The second idea is a variant of the first and locates the difficulty in the young women themselves. Jewish young women have a reputation for being high-strung, nudges, and aggressive.

It is true there has been a shift because of women’s lib towards more independent and self-sufficient women. Jewish liberal women have participated in this movement; but who can say how much is Jewish and how much is the way women are today. I think it was true around the turn of the twentieth century there were a considerable number of Jewish women who suffered from hysteria; at least that’s the impression I get from reading Freud...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. Shh! You're interrupting David Broder's sex fantasy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Nicely written.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. k & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC