Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leaking Oil Well Lacked Safeguard Device (required by Brazil and Norway) - WSJ.com

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:20 PM
Original message
Leaking Oil Well Lacked Safeguard Device (required by Brazil and Norway) - WSJ.com
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704423504575212031417936798.html


The oil well spewing crude into the Gulf of Mexico didn't have a remote-control shut-off switch used in two other major oil-producing nations as last-resort protection against underwater spills.

The lack of the device, called an acoustic switch, could amplify concerns over the environmental impact of offshore drilling after the explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon rig last week.

U.S. regulators don't mandate use of the remote-control device on offshore rigs, and the Deepwater Horizon, hired by oil giant BP PLC, didn't have one. With the remote control, a crew can attempt to trigger an underwater valve that shuts down the well even if the oil rig itself is damaged or evacuated.

~~
~~
The U.S. considered requiring a remote-controlled shut-off mechanism several years ago, but drilling companies questioned its cost and effectiveness, according to the agency overseeing offshore drilling. The agency, the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service, says it decided the remote device wasn't needed because rigs had other back-up plans to cut off a well.
(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the valve was damaged (ie, they can't close it manually)
would this remote closure even have worked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for asking that.
It's not clear from what I've read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Good explanation below this post...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Probably not. From what I've heard, it's triggered not by a wire or radio signal, but...
by a sonic code sent through the water. Just like radar doesn't work underwater, so you use sonar.

I've heard experts say it probably wouldn't work because it's a mile deep, there are several thermoclines (the place where layers of water with different temperatures meet) and then with severe disruption going on around the pipe a clear signal would likely get lost.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Good information. In light of this, I am thinking that until a PROVEN
backup solution is found, all deep water drilling should cease and desist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I work with sonic transducers
we lower the transducer on the end of a cable until it is a couple of hundred feet from the sonic receiver release mechanism that lets our gear, usually a current meter (ADCP) float back to the surface for retrieval. The transducer, even with background noise, would have slammed the back-flow preventer valve SHUT if it was installed.

Cheney policies allowed BP to avoid the half-million dollar expenditure, so now BP is paying out about $10 mil a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. true, they are stupid beyond stupid, because they undermine themselves at every corner

and continue to kill off the ocean's life at the same time - lose/lose, and yet it seemed such a good idea at the time - uh huh

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. OK, it makes sense to lower the transducer, but...
how would it work lowering it a mile down? Lots of things to go wrong down there.

I heard something I can't verify about the failure rate on these things being pretty high, around 50%. If it's normally that bad, then why would one expect it to work on a well this deep?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I am not aware of the failure rate
I just know that the back-flow preventer valve and the associated sonic closing trigger can be designed and built to operate at extreme depths.

We got screwed because between 2000-2008 Cheney obviously gave the oil goons carte blanche to drill away without having to deal with safeguards the good ole boys considered annoying, like an automatic back-flow preventer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. According to the article they do not really know what happened or why the valve did not work ..
I don't know if they have determined the valve was damaged.


"Transocean Ltd., which owned and operated the Deepwater Horizon and the shut-off valve, declined to comment on why a remote-control device wasn't installed on the rig or to speculate on whether such a device might have stopped the spill. A BP spokesman said the company wouldn't speculate on whether a remote control would have made a difference.

Much still isn't known about what caused the problems in Deepwater Horizon's well, nearly a mile beneath the surface of the Gulf of Mexico. It went out of control, sending oil surging through pipes to the surface and causing a fire that ultimately sank the rig."
"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I thought I heard that the reason the robots couldn't activate it is because something
down there was damaged or malfunctioned.

No telling where I got that though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. If the Hate Radio of print is saying this,
they must have found a way to blame it on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. This was considered under the Clinton Administration
Prior to USSC selection of 2000.

"The U.S. considered requiring a remote-controlled shut-off mechanism several years ago, but drilling companies questioned its cost and effectiveness, according to the agency overseeing offshore drilling. The agency, the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service, says it decided the remote device wasn't needed because rigs had other back-up plans to cut off a well".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. As everybody knows, the GOP front men for the oil industry won out...but that may change now..
Oil Spill Silences Once-Raucous 'Drill, Baby, Drill' Camp

"Drill, baby, drill" is now, "Hush, baby, hush."

The Republican battle cry that crystallized the growing popularity of offshore drilling has dropped from view since the Deepwater Horizon rig sank last week and the well it drilled started shooting crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

As Democratic opponents of the oil industry stepped up their attacks and demands for a sharp turn away from drilling, Republican leaders in Congress have slipped out of rapid-response mode and are generally holding their tongues.

The National Republican Congressional Committee has issued at least 11 broadsides at Democrats since the rig sank in 5,000 feet of water. Most dealt with financial regulatory reform. None addressed the rig explosion or spill. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) has focused on jobs and health care in the nearly 20 statements he has issued in the past week without a word about the spill or loss of life, though at his on-camera news conference this week, reporters did not ask him about it.
(more)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Exempt from Environmental Review
Just say that out loud a few times. I did and I'm about to punch the wall.

The Interior Department exempted BP's calamitous Gulf of Mexico drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely.

The decision by the department's Minerals Management Service (MMS) to give BP's lease at Deepwater Horizon a "categorical exclusion" from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on April 6, 2009 -- and BP's lobbying efforts just 11 days before the explosion to expand those exemptions -- show that neither federal regulators nor the company anticipated an accident of the scale of the one unfolding in the gulf.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/04/AR2010050404118.html

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x294784
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Dept of MMS - environmentalists refer to it as: Dept of Minerals Mis-management
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC