Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Deepwater Horizon REALLY Be Spewing 70,000 Barrels Per Day? Answer: YES

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:34 AM
Original message
Could Deepwater Horizon REALLY Be Spewing 70,000 Barrels Per Day? Answer: YES
NPR is now reporting that the oil spill could be 70,000 barrels of oil a day, which is considerably greater than the estimate of 5,000 barrels per day currently being reported. What is the view of Oil Drum readers regarding the likelihood of the higher estimate being accurate? According to the story:

The analysis was conducted by Steve Werely, an associate professor at Purdue University, using a technique called particle image velocimetry. Harris tells Michele Norris that the method is accurate to a degree of plus or minus 20 percent. That means the flow could range between 56,000 barrels a day and 84,000 barrels a day.

Another analysis by Eugene Chiang, a professor of astrophysics at the University of California, Berkeley, calculated the rate of flow to be between 20,000 barrels a day and 100,000 barrels a day.


http://www.businessinsider.com/could-deepwater-horizon-really-be-spilling-70000-barrels-per-day-2010-5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Meaning a major blob is held unseen by
a subsurface thermal barrier.....When/if that meets the coast, it is really going to REALLY SUCK! Perhaps with little or no warning :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. BP seems to think that the name change made all of their past spills ancient history.
Edited on Fri May-14-10 09:12 AM by Altoid_Cyclist
They're partly correct, this one will be historical for years to come.

All I can say is that the letters BP damn well better not stand for Beyond Prosecution. :mad: I'd like to see these worthless beings nailed to the wall both financially and legally. It won't bring back all of the life forms that will be killed or the livelihoods of the fisherman that are being destroyed. They better not be allowed to tie this up in the courts for years just to have the SCOTUS cut the fines to a fraction of the actual damage ala Exxon and Alaska.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, but Rush says it's only 5K gallons a day
and that's what the idiots will believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC