Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Gloomy Analysis of the Economy (Is Greenspan worse than Bush?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Centre_Left Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 07:28 PM
Original message
Another Gloomy Analysis of the Economy (Is Greenspan worse than Bush?)
My god, I hope he is exaggerating. The Fed and our overborrowing may eventually ruin us all...

http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/oldupdates/2004/0618.html


If alarm bells are starting to go off in emerging markets, they are also starting to ring here in the U.S. Higher oil prices and an insatiable appetite for foreign goods is driving U.S. trade deficit higher. With the U.S. importing more expensive oil, our trade deficit will be heading higher in the months ahead. A 30% drop in the dollar since 2001 has failed to put a dent in our trade imbalance. This means the U.S. will need to attract a prodigious amount of foreign capital to help fund its twin deficits. Without that foreign capital, the dollar heads lower. The only way to attract more capital is to raise interest rates. However the higher interest rate rise, Greenspan and Co. risk bursting America’s multiple bubbles in mortgages, real estate, bonds, and equities.

(snip)

Companies, consumers, and investors are going to have to cope with higher inflation rates. This also implies collapsing values for anything associated with credit from autos and luxury goods to real estate. While there remains many similarities of today’s markets to the 1970s, there are also differences. One is that the U.S. imports more energy than it did during the 1970s. We are also heading towards peak oil production. The higher oil prices of the 70’s were a geopolitical concern. Today they are geological as well as geopolitical. There is less aboveground stockpiles of commodities. Our energy and commodity infrastructure, the basis of a modern industrial society has been ignored and allowed to go into disrepair. New energy and alternative energy sources will take time to find and develop. That is why commodity prices will only head higher in the years ahead. It is why Pimco has started a commodity fund. It is why investors such as Steve Leuthold is buying commodities and storing them in warehouses. It is also why the smart money has been moving into gold, silver, commodities and foreign currencies and hard assets. The Fed is behind the yield curve and so is Wall Street. It is time to get real as in owning real assets. The time is now before the stampede begins or the unraveling unfolds.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. heavens, i can only concentrate on one crisis at a time
can i defeat Bush first, then deal with this ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Centre_Left Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We have no direct control over this one; so go right ahead (nm)
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myopic4141 Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Credit Market Debt (CMD)
About half way down the article is a segment on CMD, only the article refers to it as Total America Debt. The "Grandfather Economic Report" link should be looked at to understand just how bad things are debt wise although I cannot find out what constitutes the "National Income" used to determine the ratios. I suspect the number is unadjusted GDP via the hedonistic inflation indexes; but, do not hold me to it. I mention this only because the rations are lower using the GDP found it the "Statistical Abstract of the US" published every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did not the Russkies lose the cold war for two main reasons: the Gipper
and the fact that no one would buy their paper/fund their deficits? Of course the force of Gipper's personality alone was ample to topple those Commie B's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swinney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Greenspan a Republican no rate hike this year
He gave Clinton 13 interest rate hikes with most coming in an election cycle.

He gave Bush rock bottom rates and is hiding true pic of inflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC