It won't matter much what unions are still allowed to do if they have no money to do it.
And even with the ability to fund candidates, unions can't touch what corporations and even many wealthy individuals are capable of pouring into a campaign.
This shows again the cost of the timidity of Democrats when they controlled both chambers of congress and the White House. If they had made the Employee Free Choice Act a priority or even made the more strategic move of repealing Taft Hartley, it would have made an attack like this more difficult. Instead, they tried to please Wall Street and the rest of us at the same time, which is like a judge trying to decide a rape case in a way that would make both the rapist and the victim happy.
While many have focused on Governor Scott Walker’s successful effort to strip collective bargaining power from the state employee unions, it is important to note the additional provision in the law that
prohibits the state from automatically deducting dues from the paychecks of state employees to be paid over to the unions.
This is likely to put a significant dent in the coffers of the unions – dramatically lessening the sums of money they have to spend in furthering the candidacies of those they choose to support. Without the money the unions provide to Democratic candidates, there will be nobody left with the kind of cash required to balance out the funds provided by organizations such as Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS in support of GOP candidates.
And it is not only happening in Wisconsin.
The dues stripping provisions are a part of the laws making their way through the state legislatures in Michigan, Indiana, Ohio and Florida with other states controlled by GOP governors with legislative majorities likely to follow.
http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/03/11/how-the-wealthy-plan-to-finance-the-american-aristocracy-with-middle-class-dollars/