Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
nradisic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 06:35 AM
Original message
Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%
Americans have been watching protests against oppressive regimes that concentrate massive wealth in the hands of an elite few. Yet in our own democracy, 1 percent of the people take nearly a quarter of the nation’s income—an inequality even the wealthy will come to regret....

...Some people look at income inequality and shrug their shoulders. So what if this person gains and that person loses? What matters, they argue, is not how the pie is divided but the size of the pie. That argument is fundamentally wrong. An economy in which most citizens are doing worse year after year—an economy like America’s—is not likely to do well over the long haul. There are several reasons for this....

...None of this should come as a surprise—it is simply what happens when a society’s wealth distribution becomes lopsided. The more divided a society becomes in terms of wealth, the more reluctant the wealthy become to spend money on common needs. The rich don’t need to rely on government for parks or education or medical care or personal security—they can buy all these things for themselves. In the process, they become more distant from ordinary people, losing whatever empathy they may once have had. They also worry about strong government—one that could use its powers to adjust the balance, take some of their wealth, and invest it for the common good. The top 1 percent may complain about the kind of government we have in America, but in truth they like it just fine: too gridlocked to re-distribute, too divided to do anything but lower taxes....

...But one big part of the reason we have so much inequality is that the top 1 percent want it that way. The most obvious example involves tax policy. Lowering tax rates on capital gains, which is how the rich receive a large portion of their income, has given the wealthiest Americans close to a free ride. Monopolies and near monopolies have always been a source of economic power—from John D. Rockefeller at the beginning of the last century to Bill Gates at the end. Lax enforcement of anti-trust laws, especially during Republican administrations, has been a godsend to the top 1 percent. Much of today’s inequality is due to manipulation of the financial system, enabled by changes in the rules that have been bought and paid for by the financial industry itself—one of its best investments ever....

http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105?currentPage=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've seen so much coverage of this very fact in the last 6months.
I think we are going to reach the moment of choice soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed
It is possible and I for one hope that we see some relief for the 99%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It won't happen under Obama
He's blown all his chances to make change I can believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Unfortunately, I must agree with you
I was hoping for so much more change in which I could believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. ironically, his protection of the wealthy will spell their doom
if he had taken the FDR route, the very wealthy could have survived a couple more decades. Instead they have accelerated their own demise. All it will take is an anonymous internet attack on all those off-shore banks and their wealth will go up in digital smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. If he had taken the FDR route
If he had taken the FDR route it would have saved Capitalism, just as it did in the 1930s. The shit storm that will soon fall on the wealthy will make The New Deal feel like a mosquito bite compared to what is coming to them. I, for one, will enjoy watching it all happen.

Capitalism has at most 20 more years, tops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. From your mouth to Anonymous' ear please. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. The last paragraph of Stiglitz' article
The top 1 percent have the best houses, the best educations, the best doctors, and the best lifestyles, but there is one thing that money doesn’t seem to have bought: an understanding that their fate is bound up with how the other 99 percent live. Throughout history, this is something that the top 1 percent eventually do learn. Too late.


Quite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. The brilliant Stiglitz, he always nails it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think THIS is the paragraph that all of America needs to understand, esp. tea-partiers right now:
"Virtually all U.S. senators, and most of the representatives in the House, are members of the top 1 percent when they arrive, are kept in office by money from the top 1 percent, and know that if they serve the top 1 percent well they will be rewarded by the top 1 percent when they leave office. By and large, the key executive-branch policy makers on trade and economic policy also come from the top 1 percent. When pharmaceutical companies receive a trillion-dollar gift—through legislation prohibiting the government, the largest buyer of drugs, from bargaining over price—it should not come as cause for wonder. It should not make jaws drop that a tax bill cannot emerge from Congress unless big tax cuts are put in place for the wealthy."


This is the part that Tea-party people need to see and understand. It's mind-numbing to see so many of the other 99% continue to get roped into voting for people and laws that actually hurt them and help these power mongers because of social and moral issues like gay marriage and abortion laws that are personal choices in a "free" country and at any rate should be handled by individuals and their own consciences and/or churches, not Federal or State governments. It's such a magic show! And the uninformed audience just keeps watching the distraction while the magician continues to make money with the trick! And with Fox news and the power that has taken over our every day media supporting the illusion the audience continues to be mesmerized by the show.

One thing that has changed is the Democratic Party's collusion in the act now. I do believe that's what has put things over the edge. There really is no 'party of the working man' any longer -- only one huge, rich, self-interested head on the puny body of what's left of what was once a shining intent for a true democratic country. And, sorry, I don't see how we'll ever get all that money out of the cogs of the system now, even with an attempted revolution here -- it would be put down so fast by martial law it will make our heads spin. Do you think Blackwater has gone away just because they have a new name now?

Anyone want to revisit Ralph Nader now? The man who has been telling us for decades that there is no two-party system, only one huge political monster.

OH. and p.s. - DONALD TRUMP is near the top of viable Republican candidates to run our country?!?!? Can I scream now? Or just start seriously researching how to leave?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The collusion is the thing
That's why I said that Capitalism has at most 20 years left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC