Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Farms' Owned by the Rich Provide Massive Tax Shelter - no real farming needed to qualify

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:23 AM
Original message
'Farms' Owned by the Rich Provide Massive Tax Shelter - no real farming needed to qualify
http://www.thenation.com/article/159943/tax-day-farms-owned-rich-provide-massive-tax-shelter


ake Michael Dell, founder of Dell Computers and the second-richest Texan, who qualified for an agricultural property tax break on his sprawling 1,757-acre residential ranch in suburban Austin and saved over $1 million simply because his family and friends sometimes use the land as a private hunting preserve to shoot deer. Or take billionaire publisher Steve Forbes, who got more than a 90 percent property tax reduction on hundreds of acres of his multimillion-dollar estate in upscale Bedminister, New Jersey, just by putting a couple of cows out to pasture. They are not alone. All across the country, a huge number of America’s wealthiest are tapping into agricultural tax breaks—and none of them have to do any real farming to qualify.

Not only are agricultural tax breaks allowing wealthy landowners to shift their tax burden onto other less-affluent taxpayers but they are also helping bankrupt public schools, which derive the bulk of their funding from local property taxes.

Agricultural tax breaks got their start in the ’50s and ’60s, as a response to the explosive growth of suburban development, which was encroaching on farmland and raising agricultural property values to the point where farmers were having paying their tax bills. Fearing that this would pressure farmers into selling out to developers, states began granting exemptions that allowed agricultural land to be assessed at rates well below market value. The practice, called use-value assessment, is today used by all but one of the fifty states to artificially deflate the value of farmland, frequently by 90 percent or more.

snip

Many states expanded the definition of “agricultural land” beyond land that was farmed to land that simply had not yet been developed. In South Carolina, all it takes is five acres of trees to qualify for a tax exemption. New Jersey requires that a landowner have five acres, but also sell $500 of agricultural goods a year from their farm. Publishing magnate Steve Forbes and his wife, Sabrina, qualify for their exemption by breeding show cows on their 450-acre Bedminster estate. “You don’t make money selling hamburger meat. You make money breeding show cows; that’s the name of the game,” Forbes told Fortune magazine in 1996. Florida requires a couple of cows or a herd of goats, which don’t have to be on the property all the time. Texan law is so broadly defined that the PGA Tour golf resort in San Antonio has been trying to get recognized as a “nature preserve” to get a farm tax break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Faking a farm should be a felony. It's fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. abuse of the system
Edited on Fri Apr-15-11 12:51 AM by Confusious
a hallmark of the rich going back thousands of years, and in every culture.

Name an empire and I can show how it collapsed because of abuse by the rich. They then enshire that abuse so it never gets fixed, and the system collapses.

"avoiding taxes is patriotic" isn't that the halmark of the GOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. meanwhile the family farmers who are the ones these things are supposed to benefit end up getting
screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just one look at "big sugar" and you'll see how corrupt the whole deal is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
66 dmhlt Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great Link to track where Billions in Farm Subsidies go
http://farm.ewg.org/

Explore it a bit, and you can find subsidies by crops; individual farms (although most of the big ones are incorporated - so you'd have to know that name); state, county and Congressional District; etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Excellent link!
thank you

Cut Spending – But Not My Farm Subsidies!
http://www.ewg.org/agmag/2011/03/farm-subsidies-paid-to-the-members-of-the-112th-congress/

Among the members of the 112th Congress who collect payments from USDA are six Democrats and 17 Republicans. The disparity between the parties is even greater in terms of dollar amounts: $489,856 went to Democrats, but more than 10 times as much, $5,334,565, to Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Shameful
this kind of abuse of the public purse must end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. One time going home from Madison...
I passed a Lincoln Mark LT on the highway with Wisconsin farm vehicle plates. I was like, :sarcasm: yeah right, that's a farm truck. :sarcasm: Farm pickup trucks get beat up, they get dirty, they get worked hard. I should know since I grew up on a small dairy farm. The owner probably never did any actual farm work with that Lincoln and if he was a farmer had another actual working truck for that purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
9.  The future( A hundred years from today )
What will our great,great,great grandchildren think of us,the ones that allowed the wealthy criminals to steal their future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC