Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Petraeus, Panetta Reflect Obama’s Support for Status Quo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:50 PM
Original message
Petraeus, Panetta Reflect Obama’s Support for Status Quo
by Randy Shaw, BeyondChron.org

President Obama’s announcement that C.I.A. director and longtime Washington insider Leon Panetta will become Secretary of Defense, replacing Robert Gates, and that General David Petraeus will take Mr. Panetta’s job at the C.I.A. reflects the type of appointments that could have been made had John McCain won the 2008 election. Obama’s commitment to business as usual in foreign and military policy is consistent with his key economic policy appointments. In fact, one is hard-pressed to name a single top Obama advisor or influential Cabinet member who represents the break from the past that Obama promised voters in his 2008 campaign. Yet despite the President’s commitment to the status quo, he is cynically reviving old campaign themes for his 2012 campaign.

When John McCain faced Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election, the Arizona Republican could not stop touting General David Petraeus and his allegedly successful “surge” strategy in Iraq. Petraeus has now become the go-to guy for Democratic President Obama, whose overall foreign policy agenda is little different from that of his former Republican opponent.

Is Petraeus running the C.I.A. really what change, Obama-style, looks like?

Full story: http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=9136
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think surfacing of a sub.
In detection range is used to show who has what control.

shrug, why alot of things occur,

weather people know it or not.



So The Justice league, with help from friends like Joker Penguin, And Riddler, still got the football

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Status Quo... does that mean the same thing as 'Change'?
Or was someone lying through his teeth during '08?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Change changes. Or the other alternative you mentioned might explain it..
But, lies are conditional, too. Think that kinda saved us from an even worse reign of error during the Bush years. This guy's got more certitude, which in a way is even more frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Maybe there was so much change so fast that we missed it, Obama being a god & all,
playing his eleventy-dimensional chess that we mortals can't understand, and this is the change that brings us right back around to where we were. Which might seem like the status quo but is really full 360 degree change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. So the PNAC mantra is alive and well all the while our economy, standard
of living, job prospects, housing market, infrastructure, and quality-of-life rankings all go to hell in a hand-basket. So it's long live fruition of the RW's longstandard wet dream of global hegemony. :shrug: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's very disappointing. Particularly Petraeus at CIA.
I know there are those here who say it's a brilliant move by Obama to keep Petraeus from running for President...but why would Petraeus be such a threat to Obama that he needs to have a Military Man running CIA which was always supposed to be a Civilian Job. When Harry Truman signed the CIA into being...it was never meant to be run by the military.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC