Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's privatize the government!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Thats my opinion Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 04:36 PM
Original message
Let's privatize the government!
A good friend, with whom I have had vigorous debates over the years, has been startled by Congressman Ryan’s recent proposal to gut Medicare. He expressed a deep concern about the use of the word, “socialist” and its employment as a slur. He points out that government by its nature is socialistic. So with his tongue deep in his cheek he writes:




“This morning I witnessed a blinding flash of the obvious. I recalled the plaintive town-hall cry a couple of years ago, ‘I don’t want government to run health care—keep your hands off my Medicare.’ Our state and national governments are the purest form of socialism. Socialism, after all, is the model in which the means of production are publicly owned. The elected officials, the employees, every ream of paper—all are publicly owned. All untainted socialism. LET’S DO AWAY WITH SOCIALISM AND PRIVITIZE GOVERNMENT! Every government program would be in private hands and would charge a fee for its services. All highways would become toll roads. Armed forces would become mercenaries. Weapons systems would be funded with private bonds. Pharmacies would add a few extra cents to each pill to fund drug safety. Passengers would pay an extra charge for air traffic control. Voting? The people would vote with their dollars and the market would decide what is needed. No more government regulations. Just free enterprise. Programs that don’t generate sufficient income through charges to customers would simply fade away. And the national debt? What national debt?

The three branches of government would no longer be publicly funded. Members of Congress would have to raise private funds from their districts or states to participate in the debate club which would replace Congress. There would be no more laws to create, since laws are the essence of socialism. Judges would rake off a percentage of settlements they negotiated. Presidents would charge admission for tours of the White House and rides on Air Force One.

I’m shocked that the Tea Party has not realized all this sooner. No wonder our government is broken---it’s socialist!"
M




The problem M addresses is generated by those attempting to score political points labeling everything the government does “Socialism.” Obviously there are enterprises that can be run more cheaply and effectively by private enterprise. When they can compete successful with government programs, the latter might well be phased out. One thinks of the most effective way to send and deliver packages. UPS and Federal Express might well take over that section of the US Postal Service. When it is more efficient and economical, privatization may be a solid option.

Nevertheless, to call those parts of the social network that government can do with less cost and greater efficiency socialism is a failure to define the term. But government sponsored programs to provide adequate health care for poor children, for instance, are not socialism. The doctors who work with these programs, the hospitals that house them, the drug companies that provide their medications are all privately run and privately financed. Practically everything we buy, sell, rent, eat, build or produce comes to us via good old American capitalism. And that’s the way it should be. The operating genius of America is not socialism.

Even if we adopted a single-payer health insurance plan, that would not be socialism, unless the government owned the hospitals and the drug companies, and hired the doctors. Ryan’s proposal to privatize Medicare—a government insurance plan—would end up costing the taxpayers more and would essentially gut the program for most older citizens. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office believes that the Ryan plan would double the expenses for the average senior. The beneficiaries would be the insurance industry’s highly priced executives and their stockholders. The losers would be America’s seniors.

We have a balanced economy in which private enterprise can do many things more cheaply and efficiently, but so can government. Medicare needs to be revised, but privatization is not the answer.
Charles Bayer
candwbayer@verizon.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes, M doesn't realize the consiquences of his statement
he has a snowbank on top of his head, full of propoganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George Wythe Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would settle for a little more self-government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sadly, your friend's tongue-in-cheek proposal is now the serious policy of a presidential contender
Pawlenty's Economic Plan: Just "Google" It

"We can start by applying what I call 'The Google Test.' If you can find a good or service on the Internet, then the federal government probably doesn't need to be doing it. The post office, the government printing office, Amtrak, Fannie and Freddie, were all built for a time in our country when the private sector did not adequately provide those products. That's no longer the case."

The US Postal Service's problems are well documented, although it provides a public service that its competitors simply don't aspire to do—and a quick Google search for "Amtrak competitors" doesn't yield much of anything. But beyond that, Pawlenty's Google Test seems to have one very serious failing: you can find a lot of things on Google.

Here, for instance, is a very short list of goods and services that would also fail Pawlenty's Google Test:

the military
police
fire departments
hospitals (if we've replaced the army with Xe, we probably don't need the V.A.)
schools
prisons
diplomats
food inspectors


http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/tim-pawlentys-google-problem


And, unbelievably, Pawlenty has not yet been laughed into oblivion. Indeed, some wingnuts seem to be cheering this on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. You think the people on Capital hill
are actually the ones calling the shots? I government is already privatized- most just won't admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheapdate Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. The US postal service will pick up a letter at my house
and deliver it anywhere in the country for 44 cents. FedEx will pick up a package at my house and deliver it 20 miles away to Franklin, TN for $13.33.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. EXACTLY. Private enterprise is never cheaper than public. It may be more "efficicent" becuase of
the huge cost......Actually fedex is not more efficient. It is simply faster. The post office is more efficient. it gets all my things to my clients quickly and inexpensively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Apparently this is lost on millions of citizens.
Of course every right wing information source squeals about the horrible USPS. No question where the dummies get their information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yet many postal workers
Edited on Thu Jun-09-11 03:54 AM by Enthusiast
continue to vote Republican. The GOP has had doing away with the USPS as a goal since the 1980s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Already been done
sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC