yurbud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-11 07:53 PM
Original message |
CHART: Cost of Wall Street bailouts vs wars, race to moon, Louisiana Purchase, & more |
|
As Washington continues to blather about the need for sacrifices for the rest of us, just a reminder of how they treat the people who broke our and the world economy. It's socialism for the rich and Somalia for the rest. http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/bailout-costs-vs-big-historical-events/">Source
|
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Is that adjusted for inflation? |
|
If not... it is meaningless.
|
R. P. McMurphy
(394 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yes. It is adjusted for inflation. |
|
Or so it says in the second paragraph.
|
FailureToCommunicate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |
4. "all the monies spent, lent, consumed, borrowed, printed, guaranteed, assumed or ... committed" |
|
in other words, they're comparing true COSTS of of other things, such as the wars, etc., to some MIX of costs, losses, and LENDING -- some of which has already been returned, and some of which will still be returned. not all of it, of course, but the point is:
this is a false comparison, apples to oranges.
given that the amounts involved are staggering even if presented honestly, and so the point remains the same, it never ceases to amaze me that people don't bother to get it right. i mean, why lie with statistics when the truth achieves the same effect?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |