Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

News Corp would do well not to keep it in the Murdoch family

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:45 PM
Original message
News Corp would do well not to keep it in the Murdoch family
The chances that Rupert Murdoch would choose to shut a 168-year-old newspaper, a profitable one at that, are nil. The News of the World's closure is a sure sign that the man at the top, known for calling all the shots himself, isn't alone any more.

News Corp is a family-run company – and, more and more, a family imbroglio. Some of the intrigue: Rupert has ceded substantial power to his son James, who made the decision to close the NoW. While James's power is part of a calculated succession plan, he also has his own leverage: he is his father's closest family ally in accommodating Wendi, the patriarch's divisive third wife. His father needs his support.

James has an often tense relationship with his sister, Elisabeth, who has a tense relationship with Wendi. Elisabeth has built her own media company, which her father bought this year, giving her great say within the company. James and Elisabeth's relationship, indeed many of the family relationships, are facilitated by Elisabeth's husband Matthew Freud, the most famous, and most famously slippery, PR man in London. One of Freud's closest friends is Rebekah Brooks, the CEO of News International, who almost everybody believes needs to be fired.

Rebekah, counselled by Matthew, has become James's most dedicated lieutenant. James and Matthew are determined not to fire her (indeed, she is an important instrument in Matthew's business).

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/08/news-corp-murdoch-news-of-the-world-closure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. The kids must be looking at their fortune disappearing
and wondering if it is time to remove the old coot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. It will be very sweet to see Murdoch forced out
even in favor of some bloodless corporate drone.

It looks like his sonny boy is already out. All we need now is for the old man to go. Ailes is likely to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. How can he be forced out? He controls a majority of voting stock.
There is no way to force the old man out. He will leave either when he decides to do so on his own terms, or when he dies. And I don't see Ailes leaving either. Fox News Channel is very profitable for NewsCorp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. That reads like a script from "Dynasty" or something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. He should have spun it off, or sold it
This is either union-busting, or big publicity ploy, or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. The family is only slightly less complicated than the Vangar family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC